I would call it a non sequitur since my comment was about the title.
I would call it a non sequitur since my comment was about the title.
As sure as Musk.
Huh? There’s nothing wrong with the headline, it is perfectly accurate.
I’m sure it had something to do with the extra fuel the booster was carrying for the attempted landing.
Maybe that's why they're not doing so well.
Hot, edgy take bro...
Not upright...
He's on a roll...
Sir, you wound me to the bone...
Damn, all my best stuff is over on the launch thread...
The next barge will be named “All dressed up with no where to go”.
Could they explode with someone else's money next time?
How much money does Musk save when his reusable rocket explodes on launch?
We'll, now they don't have to worry about sticking the landing.
Sooner than you think...
It was epic, better than the last two!
Oooooops...
Are you 12?
Didn't France also lose to Columbia?
Well, SX claims landing costs come from their own pockets but when NASA is cutting you checks for hundreds of millions of dollars for other development costs there really isn’t any accounting of what it is going for.