pichou
pichou
pichou

I am overweight and pregnant and have only received one comment from an OB about weight and that was at the beginning of my second pregnancy because I gained 4 pounds in a month. However, I knew that the previous months weight they had for me was off and should have been more because I hadn't eaten lunch yet or drunk

Having never fired a gun, I can only speak as an outsider, but I think it is more important to encourage ownership of the good results of their shooting (marksmanship, hunting, etc) than the gun itself, if that makes any sense. I think using a gun and demonstrating responsibility and understanding of its power should

Anal is an India name. It means fire. In researching names from my current fetus I came across this gem. It goes nicely with Ishat, which means superior. Ishat Anal. It's my first choice ;)

You can teach a kid lots of dangerous and useful skills under supervision. It's another thing to give them a weapon as a toy. Hell, at 5 I was barely allowed to operate safety scissors by myself. I don't think that we should be marketing guns towards a demographic that is still wearing pull-ups to bed.

All I could think about was when was the last time they took a shower and how musty everything must be wearing those heavy clothes and trekking great distances every day. I like soap....

This is not an easy question to answer and many Jewish theologians have debated over this for centuries. A typical response is that trying to understand God's motivations is an inappropriate activity in some respect because it presupposes that we can understand what is greater than us. If we could understand why God

Your perspective is that you're denying yourself something because you personally don't see what is to gain from following these laws. You aren't looking at what motivates the persons actions. The Orthodox perspective is that they are gaining something by following these laws that turns the practice not into denial

It probably wouldn't be too complicated or difficult (depending on where you live) to find an Orthodox rabbi willing to convert someone born of a Jewish father and non-Jewish mother. The hesitation would be, will this person continue to be Orthodox or will they become Conservative or Reform further down the road.

It isn't denial, it's about modification and sometimes it's challenging but most of the time it's about making conscious choices.

most would say they don't abstain from those foods because God cares, but because *they* care. It's about making all aspects of daily life about your relationship to God. This means making sacrifices and choices that might make life difficult, but that's the challenge.

I noticed that too. She also skipped Sikhism. Seeing as these are the two religions in my family, I couldn't help but notice their absence.

Is this a lace up crotch? I'm not going to lie, I think this outfit is hot.

Did you not watch the clip? She says she wants to get married, but no one has ever asked and probably wont after seeing this clip. She's drunk and being silly. No one is single shaming. Sorry if I can't tell that you were being sarcastic or something, but it's in the clip so this comment isn't out of left field or

My experience has been very similar. I wore my pants till about 4-5 months, then switched to maternity pants. Most of my tops I could wear until the end, I only bought a few maternity or nursing tops and those I was able to wear after the baby as well. I tend to favour longer tops and sweaters, so those just rode up.

Me too!

You didn't criticise my points, you questioned my motives and called me insincere. Two very different things. You might want to admit to at least doing that.

My issue is that Ginny is given even less character description than Cho. It always bothered me in the books that Ginny was just such a non-character, but Harry was supposed to fall in love with her. We're told nothing of interest about her, but that other boys find her attractive. Ugh. At least with Cho we see that

Tokenism is perhaps the only real critique that Rostad makes against JKR, in my opinion. But tokenism itself is not enough to cry racism. She makes mistakes in her critique, such as the expectation that Cho is a significant enough character to merit more fleshing out. Only the 3 main characters, plus Neville, Luna,

Think you deserved measured and mature for suggesting that I'm trying to discount racism and being insincere about wanting to listen to someone's point of view? I'm not one to be easily dismissed.

Would you have preferred that I asked her at the beginning? The middle? What gives you the authority to question my sincerity, which BTW is fucking sincere. So I'm pretty offended that you assume I'm just being a dickhead who wants to defend Harry Potter and refute all charges of racism because I'm just a dick. So