You probably already know this but we can and have corrected for variable levels of atmospheric C14 by calibrating readings against samples of known age, e.g. tree rings. varves, and corals.

This is why the government should stop sanctioning kids with EIC or any other subsidy, but that's obviously a pipe dream, so I'd be happy with limiting it two kids, and after that don't ask the rest of society to support your spawn.

Considering how often many of us have learned to clench our teeth and bite our tongue any time we see or hear the nauseating, self-serving face or voice of our current sitting president, we've gotten plenty of practice at repressing visceral disgust.

Knew a guy who was a casual heroin user and have thought about trying it assuming it was of medicinal quality.

I did!

Not a lawyer and have never served on a jury—though I've been notified twice—but I'm going to assume yes.

As great as these quotes are, and they are, I rather wish their owners had restrained themselves long enough to get on the jury and convict him on all charges, racking up enough prison years so that no one alive today will have to hear about him again for the rest of our lives.

Not as flexible as I'd like to be.

Can certainly appreciate this from a practical standpoint, but unfortunately my own hands, mouth, and feet are poor substitutes for what another human can do to me in and on places where my own hands, mouth, and feet either can't reach or have reached so many times as to become rote.

I figured it was something like that, but then why were Richard's no doubt luxuriously smooth silk boxers all up in a bunch (points off, though, for wearing a noticeable A-shirt underneath his dress shirt) when Kat came to visit him?

Just spitballin', but maybe try having a no-Trump zone area and/or time where any mention—by person, device, or even print—of that evil shitstain is strictly verboten.

A large part of that is probably economic uncertainty.

Had no idea who these "Return of Kings" were until I read this column and looked them up, so thanks, Dan, for introducing me to another group of prejudiced, entitled, whiny pinheads.

That "states rights" shibboleth is such bullshit, especially when it gets dragged out today to justify discrimination and violation of civil liberties, the prime example being the so-called "bathroom laws".

Just what you'd expect from someone who posted, "The Civil War was more about States rights than it is about Slavery"
https://disqus.com/home/dis…

Shower scenes distract me both for how much hot water they're likely using (in an apartment that small it seems like five minutes would be the limit) and the coordination of shooting angles and poses/movements to keep everything basic-cable kosher, made all the more difficult by having two naked bodies to coordinate.

Missed the first ep. so it might have been explained there, but what's the big deal with not outing Sutton and her well-heeled beau?

No children, but have noticed that the advancing years have made me both more sentimental and cynical, the feeling of "yeah I've seen this all before" but this time around have eked out a little wisdom and humility to let it get to me.

They did bring it back.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wi…

Unless she specifically avoided the cartoon out of some misguided prejudice, I wouldn't hold her not having seen it against her, especially if she ends up responding to it like most feeling humans by being reduced to a quivering mass of jelly.