@Jai: It's useful if you synchronise your Gmail to an IMAP e-mail client. Using labels, my mail will be sorted the same way when I fire up The Bat! whose Quick Templates I rely heavily on.
@Jai: It's useful if you synchronise your Gmail to an IMAP e-mail client. Using labels, my mail will be sorted the same way when I fire up The Bat! whose Quick Templates I rely heavily on.
@Michael Balazs: Exactly. It did not help.
I forgot to mention: Disabling the labs features going trough http://mail.google.com/mail/?labs=0 does not seem to help.
Great post. Almost missed it, though, since it was tagged with iPhone.
Nothing beats organic sun dried apricots (which the ones in the picture clearly aren't - the organic ones are dark brown), though. But I guess they are unhealthy because they're simply better than any candy; so you risk overeating them.
Wrote in Opera 9.6 - mostly because I fail to see why it does not deserve a mention here together with the other browser betas.
Apparently, you also have to be logged in to be able to see HD videos.
Ubuntu, clearly. The other candidates don't matter without it.
Well, uhm, actually... Opera has an office in Mountain View as well.
Happy to see Opera finally implemented auto-update, which it has received a lot of criticism for not having previously.
Voted for Ubuntu. It has come a long way in 2008 in terms of usability. The runner-up for my vote would be Skype 4 Beta 2.
I might give this a try - if I can get past the name.
Oh, also... "automagically". Ew.
I keep my stash of cash in the... nah, nevermind.
Good riddance.
It is an eye opene... uhm, I mean, it is very edifying for someone not speaking English natively to read these comments. There are a few phrases, which I thought was really cool, that I will have to root out of my vocabulary going forwa... ahem... full stop after vocabulary.
@owenl1998: I am sure that most Skype users who do not need anyone to be able to contact them have already applied this fix. For the rest of us it is indeed a problem that I, too, wish Skype would look into.
@Ian: We do know, Ian. Hence the sarcasm.
Not sure I understand the relevancy of the link to that Webmonkey post...