On a fundamental level, you’re dead wrong. When the apparatus is doing horrendous things, it’s your duty to expose them. You took an oath to defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic. If you don’t step up when, say, you learn of a cover-up of a helicopter pilot shooting Reuters journalists and laughing about…

Or how about also pointing out that his administration is actively limiting *legal* immigration, as well after he says “I think you have to come in legally”? Good god, these fuckin’ reporters.

If my one cat were abandoned even 25 feet from me, she would find the closest house that would offer her treats. She is the Biden of cats.

hell yeah, melting the planet to own the libs

That’s not how it works. That’s not how any of this works.

Good Lord, I look forward to moving past the “vanity project” phase of the campaign season. I’m not as worried by the large field as some people are, but I am getting very tired of these useless chucklefucks who seem to have no real purpose but to dampen enthusiasm. Go back to locally disappointing the people of Ohio,…

Yeah, remember in 2016 when Dems ran the poster child for bland centrism and she *checks notes* lost to the far right conspiracy theorist who labelled an entire segment of the population “rapists and murders” and was caught on tape gleefully bragging about committing sexual assault?

But it’s not like she lost largely…

The pinnacle of the moderate democrat, is staring down the existential threat of climate change and the sustainability of the human race as we know it, and saying, “Now, now, there’s no reason to get upset. We don’t want to scare off the centrists who haven’t decided if it’s real or not yet”

Funny how we LITERALLY just watched an extreme, norm breaking candidate win in 2016 but somehow norm breaking Dems with big ideas like Sanders and Warren are painted as “too extreme” to win 

If the debates were hosted by Fox News, I don’t even think that Shep Smith or Chris Wallace would spew as many conservative GOP talking points as last night's moderators 

The problem with the thinking is twofold: 1) Impeachment is a political process and not a criminal process so it would be hard for Trump to argue double jeopardy & 2) A president can be impeached for reasons that are not a violation of federal criminal statutes. So, even if double jeopardy did apply, the house can…

LMAO.. The eagle(s) are from the Russian coat of arms..

I don’t disagree that this likely was not an innocent mistake. They probably hired some IT or design person who didn’t adhere to their ‘philosophy’ but wanted the money, and that person took the opportunity to fuck with Trump in a way that is subtle and yet obvious. And to that person I say, Well done!! 

Except your “plan” is bullshit that demonstrably doesn’t work at all, and just more typical Boomer pull-the-ladder-up horseshit. I came from an impoverished family that lived on AFDC for most of the 80s. My mom finally got a job, as a public school teacher in a remote rural district in northern Wisconsin, in 1989.…

Since your idea of politics is to pass policies to satiate your obvious deep need for affirmation, would you settle for just a congratulations card and allow us to implement policy that benefits society as a whole?

“I’m not racist, I’ve got slave friends.”

Dude is only wearing 5 pieces of flair. Can’t be trusted.

sunk cost fallacy.

Kilmeade nailed it. I remember when I was working at Burger King in high school and earned Employee of the Month, I got so many calls from Wendy’s and McDonald’s trying to recruit me that I practically had to change my number! Eventually I worked my way up to Team Leader at BK, but since I couldn’t figure out what to…

They don’t even need the Mueller part, he commits impeachable offenses daily.