I’ll sign your petition that we add “The Savage” back.

I wonder if I’m the only one that cringes every single time I read “She-Hulk”. My god that sounds so dumb and sexist. She-Hulk? Really? Why no He-Hulk?

It’s like the character was named by a 12 year old boy from 1954. 

Frank Herbert was rejected by twenty book publishers he approached, eventually putting Dune - an all-time masterpiece - out via a publisher that specialised in car manuals.

Depends on who isn’t understanding the scene. Executive male decisions maker more than likely than say, a female producer or some sort.

We’ve been printing food for a long time. Injection molded chicken nuggets, anyone? I mean, if you’re 3D printing it, you still need some sort of “filament” meat-goop. You might as well just skip the shaping part and squeeze the tube into the pan.

Seriously this seems more driven by his failure to get the right permits than anything else. Not sure if that’s news.

Thank you for the reply, especially as a lawyer.

I was aware of that $145bn award, being a Florida native myself. However, the Florida Supreme Court upheld a decision to throw out that award back in 2004, which goes to my salient point about the unlikelihood that this punitive award gets upheld.

Nah, fuck em.

a legally sketchy business

It doesn’t matter cities will simply change the laws whenever they run into issues getting rid of business they don’t like. Atlanta has spent millions chasing these types of stores over the years. It really is selective enforcement to please  the rich in most cases.                       https://www.ajc.com/neighborhoo…

I AM an attorney (in 3 jurisdictions), although not Texas, so I can’t claim to be an expert on Texas state law. That being said, torts is a field of law where although there are some pitfalls, broadly speaking, many states have similar principals in a lot of areas.

Wow so they left the most important parts out of the article. Good job gizmodo. Totally changes everything.

She feels that as a white woman she has a right to do whatever she pleases without fear of reprisal. 

“Only one crime at a time,” as the saying goes.

Not an attorney, but I can’t imagine those damages being upheld on appeal.

Even though Charter is a shit company, their lawyers aren’t wrong in saying that this singular technician committing murder would be reasonably forseeable solely because he lied on his resume and had stolen in the past. Also, these punitive…

It seems like if you're going to open a legally sketchy business, you'd at least get all your building permits and stuff in order. Why ask for the trouble?

This is a case where hte jury was basically “fuck these guys” and with damn good reason. Juries are given wide discresion as finders of fact, and unless there was something faulty with the jury instructions or soemthing, it seems pretty uphill battle to challenge the finding of fault or the proportions.

Thank you, the fact they knew he was stealing credit cards is a terrible look but “they knew he’d commit murder” seems like a leap, let alone for ‘developing nation GDP’ money.

Plus, isn’t that a criminal matter in addition to the civil case?

The jury found that Charter Spectrum committed forgery beyond a reasonable doubt,