The vast majority of electricity is powered by fossil fuels, so you’re just adding another middle-man into the equation.  It’s not really plausible for people to go “off-the-grid,” unless you have enough private property to build a wind- or solar-farm and are able to park your car there.

I make a wage (technically a commission), I was just using the term “salary” loosely.  I actually make about $10 / hour, which at full-time, winds up being something like $14.4k / year.

Even if I could find a plug-in in my price range (<$3k), we don’t have the infrastructure locally to be able to charge except for at home, and since I don’t have a driveway or an exterior power outlet, it’s pretty moot.

Ah, missed that part about the max.

Or maybe we should stop taking money from poor people so the middle-class can get a handout that’ll just end up sitting in the bank instead of being put back into the economy.

That’s my tax money. Where do you think those tax incentives come from? They just grow on trees? That shit comes out of my paycheck, and I’d rather it go to something that everybody can actually use, not give a $7,500 handout to someone who’s already doing well enough to buy a new car.

[redacted]

The incentives are only applied to new vehicles; the idea is to get more electric vehicles on the road, so it doesn’t get applied to vehicles that are already replacing ICE cars.

$600 / month would cover that pretty handily, would it not?  I’m pretty sure you can finance a Range Rover for around $800 / month, so unless I’m missing something, $600 / month should easily cover a SuperCrew with decent optioning, and maybe even partially cover the insurance (if that $600 / month can go towards…

Well, that wouldn’t be factually correct, doh; he could have said

Yeah, these incentives just need to die. Why should I have to pay for a person’s car, especially when they can afford one and I can’t? This is just another tax cut for the wealthy on the back of the working class, and on top of that, they pay shit towards maintaining infrastructure.

They did, but the CD player wasn’t introduced to the automobile until 1987.

I was just talking about the way he worded the ad.

I don’t understand why she doesn’t just get another F-150; 22 MPG is a piece of cake, she’ll have a new model with 4 doors and plenty of in-cabin storage capacity.  If she likes the F-150 so much, she should just marry it (literally).

That would be pretty unique, considering Chevrolet didn’t offer CD players in 1985.

You realize you can’t just leave a car in dry storage, right? You need to drive it at least once a week to keep the internals from rusting, so I’m not sure where this “you can’t enjoy driving it” thing is coming from. Driving it to a show literally every weekend would only add 1,200 mi to clock annually, and that’s…

The first part makes me think that he somehow tricked GM into producing a car that had two transmissions in-between a single motor and single rear-end.

Does it only have 10k miles on the clock?

I heard you like louvers! So I put louvers inside your louvers so you could louver while you louver!

In a couple of years when a mint example of a rare 3rd-gen like this is going for $70k - 80k, everybody’s going to be on here bitching about how stock Camaro prices went through the roof, and how they should have bought something like this at $30k when they had the chance.