i agree, but they blurred it to protect the identity of this very bad kindergartner

Extra impressive that he could drive with some sort of horrific face void

So basically, at least how I’m reading this, Gaga regularly assaulted and/or sexually assaulted Jordan because she wanted to go all “method acting”? And we’re going to be all “YAS KWEEN!” about it? O.K., then.

I need help! English is my second language so I must be missing something because that hilarious story sounds to me like Lady Gaga raped a 65 year old gay man.

it’s not white only in America. Armenia is situated on the Caucassus. What is the precise term for white person? Caucasian. Coined from Caucassus.

Let’s put it this way: they aren’t black and they make their money looking black-ish without actually having to deal with the stigma, racism and disadvantages that actual black people generally deal with.

Does Ana de Armas know this isn’t Ben Affleck? [Celebitchy]

I think a more accurate term for her and some* of her sisters would be blackfishing where white women use makeup, excessive tanning and hair styles to appear as though they have some black ancestry or are mixed with some other typically dark-skinned and dark-haired ethnic minority.

Thanks. We’re rooting for you too.

Note that these weapons were already heavily regulated. They required a special license and could only be transported between the owner’s home and gun ranges, where they could be fired legally.

This was part of the Liberal Party of Canada’s electoral platform. The mass shooting just gave it more urgency.

You haven’t seen them style their baby hair? Not their daughters’ mixed hair, but their own. 

She thrives off the attention. Even when she gets dragged because it makes more money.

She has a history of being photographed in a way that makes her appear much darker than she really is. And being DRAGGED for it. Since the last “scandal” was mere months ago, I’m surprised that she still seems to have no self awareness.

Geddes’ work is what Hallmark stores in the ‘90s were full of. She’s like the Thomas Kinkade of baby photography. Is it annoying? Yes. Is there an argument to be made about the commercialization of art? Yes. Is that what this article is doing? No. Artists deserve to be paid for the work they do, period. Sour grapes is…

I’m not going to snark about her wanting to get paid for her work, that’s understandable. I’m definitely going to snark about a) the $250K-$350K cost of those shoots and b) her photos always kinda creeped me out anyway (but the creeping part is my problem).

Oh word? Welcome to the late 20th century, girl. Anyone doing any kind of art-related job has been on the ropes since the mass availability of photo-editing and desktop-publishing software. Why pay an actual professional a couple hundred bucks for a logo when your nephew “can do one on his computer thing”? Why pay for…

it takes about $250,000 to $350,000 to produce the kinds of shoots that I do

I used to produce commercial shoots. I don’t know where she arrives at the $250k - $350k cost per shoot unless she is already paying herself handsomely or she’s looking at multi-week sessions where everything is bought, not rented. 

Of course she wants people to pay for her work. I know on Jez snarks got to snark but y’all have some odd things to be snarky about.