Sorry, that was meant to be tongue-in-cheek. JarJar has no redeeming qualities (except that he's not Randy), so I was suggesting that Randy is even less redeemable.

Dong may sound awful, but—I te' you everyting, I te' you I saw, no, no, yeah, he looooka like a man.

Sure, you can. It's simple. I loved Tim Blake Nelson in O Brother Where Art Thou, but I hate his performance in Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt. ;)

Nothing about Randy is realistic or funny. He's an insanely exaggerated cartoon who adds nothing of value to the show. He's not "funny stupid," he's just stupid, the kind of stupid that gets itself killed by the age of 5 because he's too stupid to exist. He seems like he's from a different show (so do the court…

The trial episodes are so bad, they make me fear for the second season. What a waste of that guest star, and what a total misfire with the outdated allusions to the OJ trial of the 1990s. Also, those episodes might be the first time I didn't enjoy Fey's performance at all. Truly dreadful…

I think Randy is a disaster, a total waste of the actor—basically, he's like JarJar Binks without any redeeming qualities. Every moment of Randy on this show is a moment I won't rewatch.

The copy editing here is tearable, no doubt.

Yeah, and that Shakespeare fellow—who remembers him, amirite?

You seem to miss the point of my comments, the article, Gaiman's essay, and Pratchett's work. But thanks for wasting time and space instead of engaging in adult conversation. My comment was clearly replying to you, but if you cannot comprehend that, then you're not mentally qualified to be judging this article's…

Not even remotely. Gaiman talks about Pratchett's anger, but he doesn't paint him as some kind of morbid monster. It is extraordinarily normal for people to be complicated, to be angry and yet be hopeful. In the case of Pratchett, he wrote a bunch of funny books, so it is very hard to deny his own predilection for…

There is nothing here that contradicts the Gaiman portrait. They go hand in hand quite nicely, so…what "rings very wrong" to you? Do you think being an angry man and thinking the world is a good place are incompatible ideas? Or…what?

Reiner felt it necessary because the book's author, William Goldman, also wrote the screenplay. Goldman added the grandpa/kid storyline. So don't blame Reiner for changing the book. The book's author changed it, by choice.

The first time I saw it, I hated it, too. But the second time, I couldn't remember why I'd hated it, and it quickly became a lifelong favorite. I'm not saying you will ever reverse your opinion on it, but I did, and I was viciously hateful about it to begin with.

William Goldman wrote the screenplay from his own book, so nobody fucked anything up. The guy who wrote the book is the guy who wrote the movie, so just like Douglas Adams and his Hitchhiker's variations, Goldman crafted a different version of the story. Whether you like it or not is a matter of taste, but saying…

It has NOTHING to do with the gaming terminology. The conversation's timing was clearly off, and it was obvious to a lot of us. (Of course, it's also obvious to some of us that he was playing a game in the scene, but again, no knowledge of gaming is needed for that observation.)

It has nothing to do with video game terminology. It has to do with obvious sitcom misdirection. It's a bit surprising that someone reviewing a sitcom didn't notice such an obvious sitcom setup of a sitcom trope. Has zero to do with her gaming knowledge, or I would have commented on her gaming knowledge.

If someone wants to make a deadly-serious drama about PTSD after abduction, that's great, but that's a different show. The entire point of this show is given in the title and the theme song. This isn't the story of people broken by such an experience; it's about people who refuse to be victims and who remain…um…well,…

Are you kidding me?! Jacqueline is far more than just a glorious, glorious, oh-so-glorious joke machine. (She is that, though.) We're not supposed to chat much about future episodes here, so…I'll just say that I can't believe you watched the entire series and still feel she's just a joke machine. Titus has a nice arc,…

He'll star in Fey's next show, "Built!", about a former construction worker who decides to reexamine his sexist leering and cat-calling behavior by becoming a male stripper—letting women treat him like meat for a change….

Yeah, it was such an obvious bit that I thought everyone was supposed to see through it except for Kimmy. Makes me wonder about how well Kayla pays attention to what she is reviewing…