Oh, you could have picked any of The Great Exclamation's comments if you wanted incoherence.

I DID type out what he said! I typed the relevant part of what Stewart said. See that part in quotation marks? That's the quote. As for posting the video, it is such an easy video to find (search for "Jon Stewart 9/11" on Google, or YouTube, or…), there's no reason to give the link. If it were difficult to find, I'd…

Based on your last sentence, you are either trying to be funny, or you are blissfully lacking in self-awareness. (If you say "neither" then it's the latter.)

No, his memory isn't even close to correct. See, there's this funny thing called video that we can watch to see what people actually did and said…

You are grossly misrembering what Jon did. He was talking about the horror of 9/11 and pointing out that it's impossible to find anything good in it. Then, as an attempt to give something slightly positive, he pointed out that with the towers gone he could see the Statue of Liberty. LIBERTY. That's the point he was…

Exactly. If the author had bothered to use the correct word, this article might have more value. As it is, I just kept thinking "Caitlin, you don't know what 'objectivity' means" as I read the article. Neutrality is what she's complaining about.

Thanks for saving me a lot of typing. It is very aggravating to see an entire article based upon a terribly flawed definition of "objectivity."

Boyle specifically said he was going to get the old man on tape, but then the old man died. Up until then, Boyle had no reason to go so far as to use a wire, and by the time he had announced his plan to get the man on tape, the man was dead.

Imagine a James Cameron version of SeaQuest. Hmm…

Suggesting Paul F. Tompkins for Blackadder is strong evidence that Les Chappell is smoking something very powerful and probably illegal. Tompkins has his place—his Speakeasy interviews are great, for example—but he is not even remotely suited to something like Blackadder. Heck, Tompkins would be better as Percy or…

Some people enjoy learning the details. "They did it with computers" doesn't say much. HOW did they do it? Did they just push a button that says 'dragons' or did they have to sketch them with pen or…? The actual process, seeing the elements that are required, is fascinating to those who aren't already well-versed in…

I read the article. Nobody called him a star or anything of the kind, so…seriously, what's the point of any of your comments? Just pointless, baseless sneering.

You'd be correct except for all of the evidence to the contrary. Then again, since nobody here called him a "star," your comment was both wrong and pointless. But keep swinging, slugger!

"We now think of him as a multi-talented genius who seemingly can do no wrong"

Boy, you are a tedious little turd droplet, aren't you?

Her monologue song was pretty good, too.

Carrot Top would be the perfect SNL host.

I still like Harlan Ellison's preferred "speculative fiction" for
anytime I'm dealing with someone who doesn't read these genres. It's
less kid-sounding, definitely. Also, it makes literary snobs pause for a moment while they parse it.

Not if you swirl your hands in the hand like a magician and use a booming theatrical voice to proclaim it as "FANTASY!" every time you mention it. Not juvenile or dumb at all.

I still haven't made it far into GoT (book or show), but I intend to give it a real try. WoT, on the other hand… You mention the size of Jordan's cast, and that's the problem. I didn't like the characters I met in the first few hundred pages, so I wasn't going to enjoy thousands of pages about even more people like…