Don't blame the non-compliant chain. It was only trying to spare our eyes from the indignity of seeing the... concept.

"How did SRT refine and use the power? Despite its monumental displacement, it only manages to put out 640 horsepower. GM managed the same power output with 2.2 liters less displacement and 2 cylinders fewer in the ZR1's supercharged V8."

At least go for the second-gen. Better looks, better quality, and a sneaky amount of fun.

Houston, I think we have a hater.

That is, indeed, a supermodel amongst cars. It's also the only one on that list I'd own if I had the money.

Did you just implicitly liken Miranda Kerr to a BMW M4?

And all for the cost of .85 V6 Mustangs.

Ford,

I would liken the Corvette not the P-51 Mustang moment, but, rather to the F6F Hellcat moment.

Spirit and Opportunity are about the size of a coffee table, and don't weigh a whole lot. Curiosity is the size of a Mini Cooper, and notably heavier. That kind of size and weight pushing down on the wheels makes a huge difference in terms of wear and tear.

Spirit and Opportunity are about the size of a coffee table, and don't weigh a whole lot. Curiosity is the size of a Mini Cooper, and notably heavier. That kind of size and weight pushing down on the wheels makes a huge difference in terms of wear and tear.

I would agree with you, with one minor caveat - the kids at Columbine didn't have anything in their hands when they walked on campus past their teachers and administrators, either.

It is if the only way to know that the man was unarmed is in hindsight. This is the key concept that you seem utterly unable to grasp.

As I've pointed out to others - demonstrate that the man is unarmed in any of the video that we have available to us. It's not an easy thing to do, even with training, and even in person. When there is a perceived legitimate threat to the safety of the general public, the automatic assumption is that the suspect is…

Maybe you've never seen a real firearm before, but they can be pretty easily concealed. Just ask the kids from Columbine.In a situation where there is danger to the lives of those around you, the automatic assumption is that the suspect is armed. Period. It's better to be wrong and shoot a single, unarmed suspect than…

I was born and raised in LA, and your comment is, by far, one of the dumbest that I've read for quite some time.

I would agree that the use of deadly force here was not appropriate, but, then, hindsight is very much 20/20.

Really? Do you think it's that black-and-white?

There was no way for the cops to know that the man was mentally ill. You can question the shooting of the man based on procedural grounds (were there other alternatives, etc.), but you can't question the shooting on the grounds that the man was mentally ill, something that is not easily recognizable.

Don't get me wrong - I'm not an advocated of the LAPD.