outrageisthenewjoy
OutrageIsTheNewJoy
outrageisthenewjoy

Trick question! A “legacy” is something that we reflect on years after the fact, not the morning after.

I think that’s a completely reasonable definition of “valuable,” but as Draper alluded to in his article, the problem with these conversations is there are many reasonable definitions of valuable.

I’m not sure it’s such a dipshit article because it goes to pains to make the distinction between Lebron’s ability (who he is) and his legacy (how he’s perceived).

Believe me, I’m not suggesting anybody do this “reliably or repeatedly,” nor do I think my suggestion is “universally positive.” Those are both straw men you’re attacking.

That’s something I used to do until I learned that it’s actually a pretty destructive habit.

If you’re going to harp on word choice, I’d think you’d have taken the time to notice that “very clear” was preceded by “seemed.”

I love watching coaches flip the fuck out. Click the link in my comment at the word “this,” and you might reinterpret what I wrote.

Yeah, I’ve been wrong many times. Who knows.

Sorry, this is the internet. You must pick a side.

I feel like I’m losing my mind, here.

If you’ve got really long, wispy chest hair, maybe give it a trim. But, you’re a man, and while leaving too many buttons open is tacky, if a single open button shows some fur, embrace that. It lets them know you’re an adult.

If you’ve got really long, wispy chest hair, maybe give it a trim. But, you’re a man, and while leaving too many

I don’t think Haisley was seriously suggesting we seek this kid out to ridicule him, and I have no problem with posting what amounts to nothing more than a silly, sports blooper. That said, I can’t wait until we move past the “era of snark” since there is nothing easier or lazier than making fun of shit and calling

“Even before Game 5, Haberstroh chronicled how sports scientists and trainers are marveling at Lebron’s unfathomable, overwhelming, workload.”

Given the Cavs’ depleted and atrocious lineup, what do you think Auerbach or Riley or Jackson might have done that Blatt hasn’t tried?

I know “SAS is unwatchable” is not a novel perspective, but dammit, SAS WAS FUCKING UNWATCHABLE ON SPORTSCENTER.

I enjoy it fine, but my partners don’t. Actually, I’d much rather go full bush, but out of courtesy to those partners (and out of self-interest), I keep it under control.

I’m pretty sure “Hot Take” has evolved to mean “any opinion that contradicts my beliefs” in the same way that “bro” has come to mean “any white guy having more fun than me.”

1) The clitoris is part of the vulva.

Alliteration: For when puns are just too sophisticated.

“But you shaving for your partners is not a courtesy, but a reflection of your own preference.”