At 3-0 in the third, was she down one or two breaks?

It would have been equally tasteless, but 100x funnier.

That poor woman. Fuck.

KrissKross MorkMindy

Either you’re approaching your 70’s, or your son should find some friends that are more age-appropriate.

How wonderful that in taking down his complaints about ad hominem attacks, you manage to mock him for being short.

The balloons falling down from the ceiling? They’re to celebrate the 1,000,000th time that joke has been told.

He’s not wrong, but he’s short and Deadspin hates him, so let the pile on begin!

“2015 to 1985 wouldn’t be as much culture shock as 1985 to 1955 was.”

I love that in your comment criticizing the use of singular/plural, you’ve made a singular/plural error of your own.

Are you a teenager? You must be a teenager.

An odd accusation, given your comment history.

Because I wasn’t responding to that argument. I was merely taking down your statement that “Okay, going by that argument, we have billions of human skeletons, so there’s no more value in studying them, right?” which even you seem to admit was an overreach.

These are both legitimate arguments, but neither is the argument you were originally making.

The author wasn’t arguing that all free items have no value. He was arguing that not all free items have value.

Except the bag of dog crap comes with associated costs and no conceivable benefits.

“Okay, going by that argument, we have billions of human skeletons, so there’s no more value in studying them, right?”

That a great example of a puzzle where the answer is counter to most people’s intuitions, and that makes it interesting/fun.

“I’m looking for great skaters and playmakers and guys that are good in the dressing room. Mostly though, I want smart players. Players with brains. I want brains. Give me brains. Braaaaaaains!

These words are very unnecessary. They can only do harm (to the notion of what’s funny).