otherwiseknownasboozyfloozy
Boozy Floozy
otherwiseknownasboozyfloozy

Because they don’t want to say or do the wrong thing and then get this guy’s case thrown out on a technicality. Look, some things take some time to do right and investigating and charging people with murder and/or hate crimes is one of those things. Despite what our illustrious president would have you think,

You know, dude took a bullet trying to help some people out. I’m....gonna give him a pass here.

I agree with you often but come on. The guy got shot jumping into a fray to bring down an active shooter. Having never been in that situation, I can’t say for sure, but I really don’t think I would be all that articulate for a while.

This is so dangerous. For many reasons, especially the safety of people in general, I hope there isn’t a major terrorist attack on his watch, because he will blame everyone but himself and his people, and the damage will be exponential because of his blaming. It will stoke and confirm racist fears, isolationism and

That’s taken completely out of context, he was talking about intervening, that’s disingenuous since he, Grillot, was trying to do the right thing. Come on, you’re better than that

Damn, and I thought I was jaded! I can’t really see what others might have said other than brinylon (I assume you dismissed or they are all greys?), so maybe they were all worse than brinylon’s comment. I was surprised to see that all you had to say was “what a cliche” about a guy that intervened and put his life in

Are you for real? One person stands up for the victims and that’s the one you want to attack for not expressing himself suitably nuanced? smh

I mean, big picture, it doesn’t actually matter who ends up in the prisons as long as he and his friends make a nice profit.

Has Drumpf said the term “radical Christian terrorism”? Like Drumpf said to Obama, you have to say it before you can fight it. How come I get the feeling the White House will not mention this.

I think he said that as explanation for why he decided to attempt to intervene.

He just means his reaction. He’s saying he would have helped anybody in a similar situation.

Is radical Christian terroism a coined term yet? It needs to be.

I signed as my ex. Great fun.

I loved sharing this with my mother. She is a neuropsychologist who teaches a lot of research methods and stats and pretty much knows everything about creating a valid survey. She just replied with an AAAAAAAHHH and “this will be great to use in class as an example of everything you should not do.”

It’s so bad, but

I signed as Jeb Bush.

I’d like to point out that this is 45's second attempt to poll on this subject, since the first time, (and I quote) “mainstream media outlets have viciously attacked it... and thousands of democrats have taken it to try to sabotage the results” according to the email he sent out to his mailing list.

Why are all the questions listed as “1.”

That isn’t social liberalism, that is lack of empathy and not looking at the impact of your actions on others. It has nothing to do with liberalism. Social liberalism would demand us look at the impacts of our actions on others. I mean I’m liberal AF but my kid doesn’t “run wild, knocking over tables at restaurants.”

Huh, lot of awful white people.

White men. Out of 38 around the table (not counting Trump), there are 31 white men, 6 white women, and 1 black man. Even by C-suite standards, that’s really white and extra-male.