In a thousand years, I'll get right on it.

News posts and confirmed data points on radioactivity are two different things. Since the simulations rely on a large amount of scientific data, and since no scientific data of any significance has been released to NILU, their simulations would be grossly inaccurate; which is the very thing they stated and was…

This link only shows two videos of simulations of possible radioactive element dispersion based on the information available. Considering there is almost no data coming out of Japan regarding the disaster, I can't put much faith in those models.

Cite your sources! Where did you hear about these misty harbingers of death?

The sound of a cracking chamber pot is also considered probable cause, as is anything else that might be construed as "a noise" such as sneezing, the laughter of children, and light summer breezes

I think most people are thinking of this medical tricorder, which was definitely for diagnosis.

Hmmm, This is what I think of when I think of a medical tricorder. I grew up with TOS but, their scanning devices never grabbed my attention like the TNG versions.

They're monsters, not slackers.

It's clear now; since you didn't reference something like "other comments", I think one could rightly infer you were commenting on the article, which makes no such generalizations.

I guess I don't understand the difference. Even if it's a filter, how does one determine the parameters of such a filter in the first place? If it works like all other software, it's up to the developer to define the minimum system requirements, which is essentially what is happening now; it's just invisible to the…

What's your point and how does it relate to this article?

Centerpoint:

quote from the article:

No. We live in a nearly perpetual tundra broken only by what appears to be endless thunderstorms. People try to avoid this place unless they work for Target, or get a sudden urge to mine taconite.

I haven't seen the data on what percentage of people rely on eggs laid by battery-caged chickens; where are you finding this?

Tiny black holes aren't considered in determining the quantity of MACHOs in the universe because current science doesn't predict their existence. This theory does predict their existence and presumably could solve the too-few-MACHOs issue. (assuming the theory is, you know, correct.)

Jaymie Matthews math is correct; I was referring to Zen's result, which is incorrect.

His math is a bit off, it's actually about 30.71 m/s^2.

I see no mention anywhere that the compound didn't have power; no telephone and internet, yes but, I believe they still had electricity

New X-ray technology has revealed previous layers of paint...