orangependeks
OrangePendeks
orangependeks

The determinant you are looking for is Poverty. The statistical differences within the demographic breakdown correlates almost perfectly with poverty. And don’t bother going down the line of “Poverty is an indicator, not a determinant.” That’s unfounded in any research, and only nestles in the minds of those desperate

The rate of innovation is slowing down, however, but your point is still taken.

The rate of innovation is slowing down, however, but your point is still taken.

There is a strong genetic component to it, absolutely. The fallacy most people make is that society and genes are somehow completely separate realms, whereas in reality there is always a feedback loop going on between the two. For example, if a group of people has a high average IQ, their society will reflect that by

We haven’t. The planet has.

Meh. We’ve been through worse before:

Now playing

That’s just what they WANT you to think:

Now playing

It just so happens that the best conspiracy video evah happens to be on this very topic:

Now playing

That’s because it’s a conspiracy! Mwahahaha!

What about Asians? They do better academically and have higher (or at least comparable) median earnings compared to whites despite not being, you know, white.

They probably should avoid publishing racial and gender demographics at all.

The conference is not the problem, the problem is with the Social Engineers in power who could bring the goals of the conference into being.

Social Engineers of any color are more destructuve than the Tsar Bomba.

You are implying here that an invention is something arbitrary and provincial; I do not think that is the case. Inventions are ultimately nothing more and nothing less than the product of man’s intelligence combined with a particular environment and the resources it bears (be they geological, biological, social,

I read this a long time ago but it did not make a large impression on me. The obvious answer to the question of “why does mathematics describe the universe?” is “because the universe has a mathematical structure to it”. One might then ask why this is so, but ultimately that is no different than asking why any other

No. I’m just sane.

Well, not entirely. Communism and Leftism in general was the overarching context of that quote, and the Civil Rights movement was only a subcomponent of it. In his 1957 “Why The South Must Prevail” National Review article Buckley was against enfranchising black voters in the South (fearing that it would lead to the

Only when the worst of it becomes reality.

As we work to shape change, we will use this space as an incubator and laboratory to grow new visions of the worlds we want to exist.

“Power”, “difference”, “alternative worlds” ... ah, music to my ears!