It’s really pretty, just wish Tweedy’s vocals weren’t quite so drowned out (reverbed-out?)

Thanks for sharing this (seriously.)  Helpful to learn different perspectives.

Enlightening perspective. Thanks.

Good to know! Thanks. But if it’s more conservative than I thought, it seems an even worse fit for the controversial piece they ran.

I haven’t read it since Michael Kinsley was in charge (so ages ago) but isn’t it a historically lefty magazine? If I’m mistaken, well, then I apologize for the mistake, and thanks for educating me. But that said, if it is more conservative in outlook, then it seems an even worse fit for the piece that caused this…

You think people who don’t feel they can come out earlier in life also don’t suffer? Either path is (usually) hard.

Good point, but still seems harsh to criticize him for choosing to do it at whatever age was best for him.

Then it would make them printing the piece an even worse fit!

Thanks for the perspective, but you really don’t think that a historically progressive magazine like The New Republic publishing an article that argues that because a gay politician came out relatively later in life than the current norm, he won’t be able to focus on his job because he’ll be too busy exploring his…

For more context, here is her full statement (via her publicist) to the Washington Post, that for some reason the article left out (maybe hadn’t come out yet?) which you can still feel free to still like, dislike, or be apathetic about, but seems good to hear the whole thing...

From the original article...

From the original article...

From the original article...

From the original article...

From the original article...

From the original article...