I think maybe you’re putting all of your sensitivity eggs in your liberal sjw basket without considering anyone else’s feelings, or the lack of science, and prefer to throw out terms like “biggot”, “transphobic”, “hate speech”, “stupid republican” at anyone who’s not in your army.

There’s all this fear of trans-women, but you just as easily forget that there are trans-men out there, some of whom, after years of transitioning, are hairy, muscular men—with vaginas. You do realize that these “bathroom laws” mandate that these trans-men are now supposed to enter the women’s restroom, right?

Awww, you just don’t know you are racist and homophobic. It’s kind of adorable.

There are already laws against sexual predation and voyeurism. If a sexual predator doesn’t care about those laws, why would they care about bathroom laws?

Yeah, it’s such a weird argument. There are already so many laws which cover these issues- rape laws, assault laws, etc.

I’ll say it again - nothing is stopping me to say “hey I consider myself a woman” and go and be creepy in a lady’s bathroom.

The same thing that’s not stopping me, is not stopping sexual predators, or voyeurs.

Nope. That’s not how anything works. If you think any person who hasn’t committed a legitimate crime or given you a legitimate reason to think they’re going to* deserves less rights than anyone else, you hate that person.

Or, ya’know, maybe you’re just making excuses because you lack the ability to imagine what life might be for transgendered folks so you’re trying to cover your ignorance and hate with (what seems like, to you) logic.

Too bad a bunch of people will pull the “IF SHE HAS NOTHING TO HIDE WHY NOT RELEASE THE RECORDS?!” card.

He dosen’t give a shit about his public image, if he did he wouldn’t have gone on that Twitter blast a few weeks ago. All he cares about is remaining employed and he or his legal team probably sees this as a way to prove to Sony that he did nothing wrong in case they were trying to fire him under some morals clause or…

Since it’s a civil case, I think he will grant it. If Kesha admitted to having a journal/diary they would be entitled to it. Unfortunately they will try to use anything against you. Sucks.

What a skeevy piece of shit. This isn't going to help your public image as someone who thinks he's entitled to women's bodies pal. Now you just look like someone who thinks he's entitled to women's bodies AND medical records in the hope he can find something to use against his victim. That's slippery, reptilian, and…

To try and prove she’s lying. That there's no emotional trauma. Ect, ect, ect.

Likely because his team wants to see if Kesha made any statements to her therapist that contradict her claims.

This will ensure any woman who considers reporting a sexual assault remains in her terrified silence for all eternity.

I’ve seen this talked about on a bunch of sites and I just don’t get it. Is Strahan a piece of shit somehow? Can somebody clue me in? Is it really just about not telling her he’s leaving ahead of time?

He needs to get a Haters Gonna Hate jacket for the last day.

Unpopular Opinion: Michael Strahan doesn’t owe her shit. I get that no one told you, but that’s on ABC not him. Are you his boss? no. You don’t fuck his wife and you don’t feed his kids, so get the fuck away from him with this petty bullshit. It’s such bullshit that he essentially got promoted and then you threw a…

Okay there’s a lot I could point out here, but since it’s late I’m just going to say that NONE of this has anything to do with your original point, that Bill Clinton’s history of alleged abuse was at all relevant to a conversation about cheating. It actually appears you’re trying to veer a bit off that subject.