ongreystreet
OnGreyStreet
ongreystreet

yeah I cant help but to crack up at the fact that she constantly tries to say that her career hasn’t taken off because of racism against her but at every turn she’s racist right back at anybody around... and homophobic... and ablesit.... any anti semetic.

thats the only way she can stay “relevant”, by attention whoring on twitter

She literally can’t exist without being negative about someone.

Are you fucking kidding me with that bullshit? She is a horrible human. Punjab and curry. Wow. Just fucking wow.

I stayed off of io9 so I’d avoid spoilers until I saw the movie yesterday. I didn’t think I needed to stay off of your fucking sports blog, too.

It’s Gawker, everyone here not named Magary is a self-absorbed sack of feces, don’t ever expect more from them.

Also, as an added bonus, this is now one of the “tending” things, so it just pops up on the left of all gawker media sites.

Not with that kind of attitude.

The movie came out 4 days ago.

I’m recovering from surgery. I am not yet able to get out and see the movie. So imagine my disappointment in seeing the title, knowing the comic history of the Civil War storyline and eager to see if the movie follows a similar path. That is what has been taken away, only 3 days after the movie has come out. That is

What if he writes a post endorsing Marchman’s cereal list? There has to be some kind of offense that would result in a banning.

Samer, maybe you should grow up and learn from your co-workers at io9 and Kotaku. They avoid crap like this.

I follow this site daily so fuck off—spoilers are bullshit and you assholes knew what you were doing with the headline. So of course people object and what do you do? Double-down on the assholery, ‘natch. Fuck you, douche canoe.

Or you could, and get this, not post spoiler filled article titles for movies that came out THREE DAYS AGO and then repost it to the sports board.

Because I’m sure that’s the only person who’s going to care about spoilers for one of the most hyped movies of the year being published in the headlines on opening weekend - not like anybody else cares, right? I mean if they didn’t bother to go opening weekend, they clearly must not care.

Grow up, working for Gawker doesn’t automatically make you in the right.

Such a dick. It’s not even your article.

Hey, maybe if I wasn’t normally such a fan of the site that I follow it on Twitter and Facebook so that the spoiler title had an extra two chances to do its work, it wouldn’t be such a big deal. No reason to be a dick about it, particularly when the article doesn’t exist for any reason other than to be a spoiler.

The movie’s just 3 days old, in America at least. No one’s asking for the article to be edited - just the title.

No one said it should. But it’s common sense to avoid spoilers in a title.