Trump wants to win over Sanders supporters. His team has been working at that for a few weeks now. If anything, he’ll try to make it a lovefest. The question is whether Sanders will fall for it.

“You know, like when the blood comes out of their wherevers. Those kinds of issues.”

The only issue I can see is that Trump badly wants to woos Sanders’ supporters. Sanders wants to gain more support going into the California primary for an upset. What are the odds these two are actually going to go after each other? I’d say minimal. Instead, they’ll likely spend an hour and a half taking pot shots at…

Isn’t he though? The best parts of any Thor movie or Thor-related scene (mug smashing, Loki smashing, etc) come from embracing the sheer camp of it all.

The sheer leaps of faith it’s taken at certain levels (Guardians of the Galaxy for example) are especially impressive. Not all the movies are great, but the end result is that you can have movies like Civil War which deliver emotional gut punches from a dude in a robot suit and a guy who once sold war bonds.

Isn’t that what the Sanders campaign has been trying to do for the past couple months, sway the supers? Even the NV fracas was started by the Sanders team trying to organize more delegates than Clinton so they could try to flip the state to Sanders after Clinton won. Hell, just running as a Dem even though you hate…

There would be a giant shitstorm over the guy who denounced superdelegates for dubverting the democratic process then using them to subvert the democratic process. Unfortunately since this Nevada thing he’s been losing a few.

How would you suggest she earn it? When she pushes further left, she’s lying and flipflopping. When she says he should stay in the race till the end, she’s lying. When she says there’s a place for everyone in the party and we should come together, she’s being condescending.

Sander’s official statement essentially says that the DNC has this coming, the establishment is lying about any violence happening, if maybe violence were happening that wouldn’t be good, but the other side did it first so it’s justified.

But why educate people when you can blame it on ELECTION FRAUD and justify all the shitty behavior? If you actually educate people, you have to admit that you were trying to game the system and subvert the popular vote of a state even though you’re a “revolution of the people.”

The supporters you attract and the behavior you encourage reflects upon your campaign’s message. How you handle things like this reflects upon you as a candidate. In the case of Trump, the Klan members are flocking to him because he encourages them by retweeting their stuff and campaigning on racism. He even appointed…

Do you really think we didn’t give the same kind of scrutiny to Trump supporters who attacked protestors? If you have proof of Clinton supporters calling delegates who are going for Sanders and threatening their lives and the lives of their families, by all means, send the tip. They should be held accountable as well.

That final quote was pretty brilliant, and I give kudos to the author. “Yeah this bitch deserves to be threatened and she should expect this, but don’t give out my real name!” What winner.

You’re so right. If only she had let those Sanders supporters game the system in the vain hope they could get more delegates than the popular vote afforded them at the original caucus. If only they hadn’t shot down a petition to remove the rule about not threatening speakers.

Thank you for writing this article. It’s a really fascinating look into this kind of behavior, and it’s awesome to see a Sanders supporter examining it. For what it’s worth, I don’t think these guys represent even a sizeable portion of Sanders’ base, but I do wish some olds would get the newer voters together and…

This is about the people who think there’s any kind of justification for calling and threatening someone or someone’s kids. It’s not particularly about the convention, and nothing about it is slanted. The author herself is a Sanders supporter. If both bases don’t take a hard look at what causes these things to happen…

Work tangential to healthcare. The place I’m in the last stages of interviewing at is healthcare related but not healthcare itself and has amazing benefits because it needs to fit their corporate image to attract clients. Bless you, perceived social responsibility.

Legal, I think? There’s a difference between quitting and getting fired in terms of what you’re entitled to.

You seriously believe Benghazi, Whitewater, and Travelgate? For real?

Please explain it to me because I came in late and now everyone’s been talking about it and I’m still lost.