Jenny Weasley FTW!!!!

The article said that the wife couldn’t take him anywhere. It didn’t say that he couldn’t be taken anywhere. It also didn’t say there was no para-transit. The article did indicate that the they are elderly. They may just have been so self sufficient for so long that they are unaware of services that may be available…

Careful there. The trans women will be out for blood. How dare you mention chromosomes in the same breath.

For roughly half of the population give or take a few percentage points, all it takes is a little testosterone to turn a person into a breast enthusiast.

Ummmmmmm

Opinions are like like assholes. Everybody has one, but not everyone wants you to share your’s with them.

You’re forgetting the "never take on someone else's protect" rule. 

The columnists are alive and hacks. 

You forget that power on capital hill is cyclical. Who's to say that after that wet dream is realized that the Republicans take control and as a few new justices themselves? It is the same folly as using executive orders to enact policy. It is too easily undone, and/or the other side could use the exact same tactic to…

Am amendment to the constitution requires that 2/3'ds of the states ratify the amendment. It was a huge undertaking to get the bill of rights ratified. There were fewer states then, no 24 hour news cycle, and no one knew what an activist was and it was still hard to get the bill of rights ratified. For those reasons,…

In all fairness, this autograph request would have been IMHO creepy in nearly every combination of ages, genders, or sexual orientations you can imagine. The fact that she is seventeen is what is known as an aggravating factor.

While I agree this is revolting, who is to say that this person didn't get his tramp stamp autograph from the male drivers too.  That would remove the sexism component and leave the revolting component safely in place.

Civilian employees of the DoD also get this benefit, but you have to opt in. It is automatic for uniformed service members.

I’ve been away from my keyboard for a bit, and just read your response. It’s a lovely piece of work. Maybe you misunderstood me. If something is justified, by definition it is right. Therefore it can’t be both wrong AND justified. For example, homicide is the act of one human killing another. The definition includes…

Your best advice is horrible advice. In order to rebut the root, one must know what the root is saying.

You are ignoring the fact that generalizing an entire segment of the population in an effort to dehumanize and demonize them is evil. Being what you were born is ok. Being proud of who you are and strongly identifying with people like you is ok. Demonizing people who don’t look like you is pure evil. One could argue…

I know it is old fashioned, but the yellow pages are full of mental health listings. The OP said there were no resources. That is empirically false.

Ahhhh. It raises its head again. Name calling. You do realize that the comment to which I responded said there were no resources for the mentally ill, right? That was the crux of my response because the article pointed out a resource. The fact that the article pointed out a resource invalidates the point made by the…

If any person generalized an entire selection of people simply because of the color of their skin, it fits the textbook definition of racism. There are some white people who certainly suck just like there are people of all colors who suck. Being white isn’t violence. Being white isn’t terrorism. And always remember.…

Well the root would have us all believe that just being white is an act of terrorism.