I doubt anyone who whines about this could handle any film that is longer than 90 minutes.  So, yes, I wouldn’t trust them with a film that gives you time to get to know characters or locations.

I haven’t seen Parasite yet, but I did see Irishman.

HOLD UP,

*edited for being too harsh.

I’m a woodworker.  If I buy trash, it will look like trash.

TOOLS: Never buy trash tools. If you purchase something cheap, chances are you’re going to buy it again.

I’d second this. I purchased a 40" Sony Bravia in 2005, and we still use it. We’ve purchased a second TV, but the other one is now in another room, for the kids, and doesn’t show any sign of issues.

When I was doing web development (back when it was called web development), “Push It” was the song we’d use to announce that we were loading our weekly build.

It’s the kind of Bio-pic that was long, but somehow doesn’t outstay it’s welcome.  In fact, I could have watched another 1/2 hour easily.

He disappeared in that role in Narcos.  I had to watch for a couple of episodes to place him.

Yep, it explains the “Thin Blue Line” flag being in the same room.

This is one of those days where I’m very glad I work from home.  I can play this loudly.

Harsh.

This is both useful, and baffling. 

John Carter is one of those films that will show up in 20 years as a “Why didn’t this do better” compilation. Good cast, good acting, excellent CGI, good plot.

The irony here is that 1970's Scorcese would have mocked 2019 Scorcese over this.

You can’t complain to the people who perfected this genre for the past 40 years that they aren’t original and artistic.

This list isn’t nearly as infuriating as the constant autoplay ads on every article.

I don’t want to roll with a new set of homies, thank you very much.

God DAMN!