Yeah, but at least you put some thought into what endeavor actually means.

That’s my biggest concern right now. The Democrats just got their teeth kicked and the mid terms look near certain to be a repeat. That has a way of dampening enthusiasm (which is already lacking) for the 2020 campaign.

This.

The left is already sharpening its knives against each other.

Michelle Obama gets vilified for merely existing.

Like most complex things in life, Nate gave what is always the correct answer, which is: “It depends.”

For whatever reason, most people see this as an attempt to hedge. A reasonable person should be able to see that it means “based on the totality of evidence, in my professional opinion this is the likeliest outcome.…

It was all a big misunderstanding!

Let us not forget this bizarre insistence of giving “differing opinions” equal say.

“Well Bob here thinks you’re sub human and should have no rights. What’s your opinion?”

The fuck out of here with that.

There is no such thing as racists in the United States.

I watched the documentary Hate Rising recently. Even the leaders of the KKK don’t think they are racist. Guys, you’re second only to Nazis as a short hand for racism.

Yeah, I think most of us lived through the aughts. The country is already full of “white anxiety”, I don’t need it getting super evangelical again.

If we get a reboot of the Passion of the Christ i’m done.

But is there though?

We are not worthy of McPooch

Huh? Debates, are rarely if ever about facts. It’s about who the audience FEELS is right and won.

I needed that.

Oh bullshit. What, do you think elections are about outcomes instead the important things like amorphous definitions of “beliefs” and “doing the right thing?”

Principals are more important than pragmatism, as illustrated by no case I can ever hope to recall.

Pretty stoked for the upcoming Breitbart article that will read:

What’s more likely?

I would like to think I will remember most guys.

He’s fine. He’s fine.

One and per sentence, asshole.

I honestly don’t know who that is. I will respond, on my own almost certainly inaccurate inference, that the issue of quality/significance/success should have more import than diversity. Is that generally fair to say? I’m not saying that they argue this is a bright line rule, mind you.

The issue that I would take with…