So pass laws to do it. Like in California, where there is no “tipped” minimum wage. Don’t fuck over those with the least amount of power in the situation.
So pass laws to do it. Like in California, where there is no “tipped” minimum wage. Don’t fuck over those with the least amount of power in the situation.
If the service worker’s wage is discounted below minimum wage in order to “compensate” for tips (which is ludicrous), then I feel like tipping is appropriate. However, there is no way that I’m tipping at McDonalds and Starbucks - they get a full wage.
Bought smokes the other day and the pin pad at the gas station asked for a tip... like WTF.
Sounds like this guy is going about it in an a-hole way, so I’m not going to boost him by going and looking at it myself, but the core point – that the customer shouldn’t bear the responsibility for the service worker’s salary – is correct, and if everyone simply kow-tows to the notion that they should “spare a…
Yeah, I reached peak tip burnout a few years ago and pretty much only tip at sit down restaurants and bars. I don’t bother at places like Subway or Starbucks anymore, it’s just a hassle and some places still use the old school receipts where you have to calculate the new total and sign with their nasty pens that they…
If youhave to pay for food before receiving it, no tip is required.
OR, these places can start properly paying their employees... just a thought.
Or should I start requiring tips at my job as well? I work in the “service” industry as well.... should I start demanding tips for each time I reset some dumbasses password? or grant VPN access? and then when I don’t get a tip I can just go…
Hold on now. A restaurant selling a $174 pasta dish can afford to pay its workers, right?
That’s because we do! Lol you jealous?
I heard about this case and the iPhone owner was on parole or probation, and was under court order to provide any cellphone access if requested.
So in the opinion of the article, all right and good thinking people should be shocked to the core at the possibility that “protesters” who condone a terrorist organisation in a far off land could be not only arrested, but could have their fanciful civil liberties infringed upon.
Jeez we're heavy on acceptable racism on this thread
Because your daily convenience is worth the price you’ll pay to protect...precisely what?....on your phone?
The inconvenience of not using Face ID far outweighs the chances that I’ll ever be in a situation with law enforcement that they need access to my phone.
biometrics r things that u can use to unlock ur phone that u cant change like ur face or fingerprint. apparently ppl think its easier to force someone to unlock their phone using their face or thumbprint than it is to stalk them, watch them unlock their phone wit their passcode n then steal their phone. n ppl r afraid…
knocking ppl “out” isnt like how it looks in tv or movies. if someone is prepared to assault u just to use ur face or thumbprints to unlock it u prolly have a waaaay bigger problem n in many cases r better off just unlocking the phone for the assailant my guy
Just a factual error in the article - the police didn’t arrest anyone for ‘protesting’ nor were they arrested for openly siding and supporting terrorist groups and spreading antisemitism; they were arrested for inciting violence, harassment, actual assaults, and trespassing on private property.
if you think you might interact with the police (at a protest, for example), you should seriously consider turning off biometrics on your phone entirely.
Payne was on parole. As a condition of parole, he signed a document that contained, among other things-
Let’s get trading then!