oh---indeed
oh---indeed
oh---indeed

How long have you had your head in the sand?

Yeah, Shark Week used to be educational rather than sensational. Thankfully, because of this idiocy, it seems to be declining in popularity. I miss when it was just non-stop documentaries.

Pinkham, if you didn't have some seriously screwed up ideas about fruit, I might think we were the same person. When I was 9, instead of skipping the 4th grade, I did a year long project on sharks that included building a scale model of a great white that you could open up and disassemble the internal organs and

The way I look at it, cash games hedge against variance more than tournaments. I've always got a few rebuys in my pocket (though 1/2 is just too much of a dice roll, I don't play lower than 2/5), and I know the numbers, as well as being rather good at reading people. Yeah, I might get sucked out on by some idiot with

Yeah, like how to properly suck my dick. Your teeth keep getting in the way.

You definitely have more experience with tournaments than I do; I basically stopped playing tournaments when I started playing full-time, save for the occasional Borgata or Foxwoods event, and pretty much the same for most of my friends who play seriously.

I mean, look at Hellmuth. He didn't play in the Big One because one of his backers got shady at the last minute over $130k. Phil had the entire million staked until that point. Do you think he was going to play the tournament for nothing? Not a chance, he would have had a piece of the action for being the one making a

Oh, I'm fully aware. I'm just pointing out that there are stake agreements that aren't exact percentage share agreements, and we don't know what he had with his backers (rumored to be at least Busquet and Harabolos [I'm certain I spelled that wrong]). I've never been staked for tournaments, as I quit playing them

That's not exactly how staking works. You'll usually get a piece of your backers' action, since you're the one doing the work. Lots of stakehorse agreements are for a 50/50 split up to a certain point, though there's no way of knowing the exact terms of Colman's agreements.

They must have told him he couldn't ask why she didn't just stay in the kitchen.

No such thing as 1/2 Limit. At least not in any casino, nor any club I've ever been to. Which you'd know if you had the poker knowledge you keep pretending to have.

Mostly I'm just jealous of the incredible blowjob you're giving him.

And it took me 4 seconds reading 1 comment of yours to see that you're "a David Blaine fan," thus I know you're no longer worth even talking to.

Oh, sweetie, I play live. Haven't played online in years. I took a few years off because it can get mentally and emotionally exhausting, yes, but I'm wondering what, exactly, you think I'm making up? Is it just that you can't handle being absolutely fucking wrong?

What's the matter, nothing more to say now that you've been shown up to be completely fucking wrong?

Check out this link, actually, it may help make some more sense of it:

Poker is a skill game, but millions still can be won or lost due to luck, so it's generally a sound financial decision. Rumor (again) has it that Phil Hellmuth, widely considered the best Hold 'Em tournament player in the world, was not in this particular tournament because he couldn't get the backer deal he wanted

It's not for everyone, obviously. I'm a misanthropic night-owl who loves to take other people's money and stay in hotel rooms, so it works out really well for me.

Here's how high-stakes poker works: people hedge against variance by selling shares of themselves and buying shares of other players. Depending on the deal he worked with his backers, he may see more than one million, but it won't be anything near the full after-tax winnings. Rumor has it he only had about 10% of his

Of course she has an "ornery Pomeranian." No vapid, trashy wannabe is complete without one.