History does not guarantee an infinite future. So these are vanity releases and/or cash-grabs but they sure as hell arent sensical
History does not guarantee an infinite future. So these are vanity releases and/or cash-grabs but they sure as hell arent sensical
this is way better.
I just bought a cheap disco ball/light show device for my wedding reception. Almost all of the reviews I read for similar products had the "I was provided this product in exchange for my unbiased review" disclaimer. This practice seems pretty rampant on Amazon these days.
I like well-made action figures of obscure characters from various media. Sue me.
(insert name of record you listen to in your basement whilst eating one here)
wikki wikki wikki
Cosby records and George Carlin records turn up in piles of used records roughly 110% of the time.
Well, there's a market for it. People are buying vinyl, so press that shit up on vinyl even though it's a terrible idea. That's why we have a 3LP colored vinyl release of the Forrest Gump soundtrack.
people were meant to hear pops and clicks and that shit.
Yup.
I like me some Oswalt, but sweet jeebus these vinyl releases of comedy albums is completely unnecessary. I know there's a history of comedy on vinyl, but c'mon.
It's mostly because of the year/decade the scene is taking place in (1981?) and her mentioning something to the effect of "they're not sure what it is."
For real, that's a well-acted scene. That feels real.
This is another move that affects me emotionally, even though I only like it so-so.
My dad always called attention to the fact that Lt. Dan tells Forrest that the day Gump is a shrimp boat captain is the day he's an astronaut, and then at the wedding his "magic legs" are made from the same stuff as the space shuttle.
"If you ever need anything…I won't be far away"
"you do seem to hate alot of things…and the bottom of your pants are awful tight. I bet you hate movies that are universally loved."
shremp soup, shremp salad, shremp and puh-tay-tuhs
"But is he smart, or is he…"
Was he using the royal "we"?