obvioushuh16
obvioushuh16
obvioushuh16

Nope, you missed every actual definition of the term.

Exactly.

In other words, GAD has a propensity to trigger aggression in men, particularly men already prone to aggression, like, say, athletes (who tend towards the high end of the testosterone spectrum).

That's a good attitude. Also, why the fuck do people think they are entitled to privacy if their blinds are open? Either close your blinds or be okay with the fact that someone with good vision/binoculars/a telescope/a drone/or a telephoto lens might be looking at your giggly bits.

Well, lord knows mental illnesses don't have completely different symptoms and manifestations for women and men. Certainly not.

If giving a shit about not seeing 15-year-old girls exploited without their consent and against their will qualifies as "pearl-clutching" with you, that's great, call me a pearl-clutcher

You're the one calling 19 year olds sleeping with a 15 year old "child molesters" - idiot. Though if you are just trolling as a weird pearl clutcher, that's a pretty good impression.

No, my strategy is pointing out that my comment addresses the two laws and they do, or should, interact. If we have a 48 month window in which we decide it's legal for someone to actually have sex with a minor, it would make sense to extend that same window to non-prosecution for possession of a video of the act by

You are just... all fucked up huh?

It even gets your expression right.

Ooooh, someone's got wonky lips.

A Jezzies' man must take what he can find as the home front is a nightmare wasteland of cats and cellulite.

I have the fundamental ability to think for myself.

"I know you are but what am I"? We're doing that huh? Delightful. Your rhetorical and persuasive skills will no doubt soar in the highest courts of the land. Now, run along before you soil yourself further.

You sure do try hard for someone who fails so often, and badly. Sad.

*yawn* pass.

Is crafting seven sentences of lukewarm insults your attempt to run for Insult Generator in Chief? Because I assure you, it is a thankless job. Very spiritually rewarding though.

Hmm, nope. Read your comment twice, still makes no sense. Fail.

Yes, and most will be struck down either for running afoul of the first Amendment or contravening 17 US Code section 512.