A test with high sensitivity rates means you don’t get many false negatives (a test that says you don’t have a disease when you actually do).

In any analysis like this, you have specificity vs sensitivity. Sensitivity is the ability of a test to correctly identify those with the disease (true positive rate), whereas test specificity is the ability of the test to correctly identify those without the disease (true negative rate). Basically, it means…

Exactly. If Jackson had shot one of these assholes how many Trumpists would be hauling out their usual “Forget your rights. If you disobey a command from a cop you deserve to be shot” bullshit?

“the protesters have the right under the 1st amendment”

Since he was fired and re-hired, how does that affect his pay rate and retirement benefits? Sounds like a great way to screw someone by starting them back off at square one after years of employment.

He’s 57 - I imagine the threat of losing his pension was a major factor.

It’s literally a version of the little kid bullshit where you put your finger or hands around someone or their face to bug them but then use the technicality of “I’m not touching you! I’m not touching you!” as an excuse for how what you’re doing isn’t wrong. Provoking someone until they snap and do something about it…

I really, really can’t stand that game they’re playing. The whole “Gee wilikers, we just want to take a picture, what’s so wrong with that?” knowing full and well what they are doing and how they will paint it later on. “Gee wilikers, we took a picture in front of the museum and NO ONE had a problem” or “Even the…

The fact that even a hint of impropriety towards white people warrants a sanction is disgusting. But, this is how you do it. Square up to ‘em and send back across the street. Enjoy your parade✊🏾

Wouldn’t the nudity and oral sex mean the signals were, at worse, mixed?

I haven’t really misjudged anything. I’ve seen one side of the story. His apology was for making her feel uncomfortable/pressured or whatever. He said he misread signals.

She’s making a life-altering accusation. “Incredibly detailed story?” Give me a fucking break. Tell me why she should be granted anonymity.

I’m a vegan pacifist borderline-celibate teetotal feminist card-carrying social-democrat who only uses public transport, campaigns for progressive liberal causes and is involved weekly in muliple charities often at the expense of my own private income, and yet I still feel I’m not ‘woke’ or socially conscious enough…

Two problems with this story (or really one combined major problem):

So you won’t watch any show with anyone accused of sexual misconduct? I mean, I admire it, but I guess you probably should give up on pop culture involving men?

Why didn’t she simply walk out? Why did she blow him? This is clearly a consensual sexual encounter she later regretted. “I didn’t really want to do it, but I did anyway” is not sexual misconduct.

It’s that last thing

I know. You should see the garbage the Sinclair Broadcast Group has been putting on. They run fake news programs, even padding with nonsense weather segments, in a lot of markets and run ‘opinion’ pieces as if they are from the local station, when they are produced in the corporate studio. They are currently looking…

Stop with the lies, and we’re all good, right? Can you do that? Or do conservative sites have a natural propensity to lie?