“first page of google” what, is her name "feeling lucky?"

I can’t imagine what you could possibly be under the mistaken impression the phrase “due diligence” means.

Rich people are crazy. After the last few years, I don’t know why anyone would want to employ him. It’s delusional the way he reacts to even incredibly mild criticism. I can only imagine that the ever-present classism that permeates his episodes makes his employers feel comfortable that what he does with the platform…

this is a real person in a movie about a real story, not a one-dimensional Aaron Sorkin character. if you want to imply someone did something so massively unethical, you better at least have something that suggests it’s true. this was just dreamt up by misogynistic hacks who don’t care about smearing a dead woman to…

I think it’s just a way of wording it to indicate that she was the one assigned to clean up after her. It’s not a criminal conspiracy to describe trash and other things you leave for cleaning staff to take care of, even if accidentally, to be described as “left for cleaning staff”. I’m hesitant to police the language …

If it wasn't reported stolen until after it was announced for auction, I'm #TeamSara.

Y’all need to chill. It’s not that dramatic. People often search for lyrics to songs and teenagers with Windows movie maker were scooping up millions (probably billions) of views by making lyrics videos. So studios started putting out Official Lyric Videos. They’re not meant to be traditional music videos, they’re low…

You realize you're not talking about an election right? It kinda sounds like you maybe don't know that.

This is going sound accusatory, but I'm genuinely curious: what is the news value of publishing an unfinished draft of something that's whole purpose is to be released to the press? Did someone leak it because there was something newsworthy in the draft that they didn't expect to make to the final version? If not, why…

What is the troubling precedent? Who does it cause trouble for?

That's not even intelligible.

really? I feel like 99% of mentions of her on here are comments like this so proud of how rebellious they are for liking the most popular popstar on the planet. 80% of the times she’s mentioned in the body of an article it’s literally just factual reporting of things that happened.

We’re talking about paid for ads though. If you change your preferences to not see them, YouTube just targets someone else with the ad though, it doesn’t change the total number of views it delivers as part of the promotional contract.

Non-violent white nationalism does not exist. At least in America. I guess if they wanted to leave and construct a new white only nation in the middle of the ocean or something, that could theoretically be a non-violent white nationalism.

Legend

I’ve always thought talking/worrying about “spoilers” is a disrespectful, commodifying way to talk about real life, especially real life tragedies. It’s just gross and places more importance on the for-profit product being sold than the real world.

It’s not about whether you blame the man for not being able to ID the scooter, it’s a question of whether subpoenaing such a large scope of data is legal. If they wouldn't grant a similarly large scope request in the case of a rental car then it has nothing to do with the fact it's a scooter.

How many more fires do these things have to start before people abandon the gender binary?

If they had to animate something, they should have done literally anything other than a real person fic. Super gross.

Blackmail