let’s face it, you didn’t need to append “right now;” this is what you will always invariably believe
let’s face it, you didn’t need to append “right now;” this is what you will always invariably believe
well if several people tweeted it
You won’t like this website, but they are linking legit sources, not Richard Lynn: http://en.europenews.dk/-Muslim-Inbree…
Those negligible-risk stats are compiled in societies where cousin marriage is rare. When it becomes prevalent, double-recessive defects increase in frequency and, therefore, so do inbreeding risks. I would need to google to retrieve but IIRC, in e.g. Pakistan, something like 70% of birth defects are due to…
There are a number of documented consequences flowing from the cousin-marriage practices that produce high consanguinity rates. Basically, if you marry within your clan, you needn’t develop the ability to trust or accommodate outsiders. You, as a husband in a patriarchal society, also face fewer disincentives to…
I already linked a peer-reviewed NIH study containing a map of consanguinity. This map covered the entire MENA region and then some. Was the study racist?
Did you even read what I wrote? I didn’t say all Muslims have a defective gene pool, but that the MENA region has an indisputable, longstanding, scientifically documented inbreeding problem which may have impacted the gene pool and, in any case, has certainly impacted MENA culture. I allowed explicitly for the…
Acknowledging some influence of genetics on macro patterns of human variation doesn’t make you a racist. Certainly it implies no racial animus.
What does it explain? What do you mean by “racist”?
If we were analyzing the behavior of any other species, would this strike you as implausible?
I am aware they’re distinct periods, but Jewish Holocaust refugees experienced both. And no, I wouldn’t attribute the disparity here entirely to Islam — genetics also plays a part. Islam takes things from bad to worse. That its holy texts are only marginally more repugnant than other Abrahamic texts is irrelevant —…
Germany during the Holocaust was undeniably a war zone and a traumatic place to be Jewish, though.
You’ve replied to me 10+ times. You’re game for a discussion, just incapable of an interesting one.
What way is that? FWIW, I think you’ve been resorting to petty, nonsubstantive replies as a crude form of evasiveness (i.e. acting “twelve”), but I’m trying to be fair to you and allow that I may have misread. So I’m giving you a chance to state your actual position, and to deliver a radical smackdown to me if indeed…
...at coaxing a coherent and substantive response? Yeah LOL @ rube trolls who try that.
What way is that? FWIW, I think you’ve been resorting to petty, nonsubstantive replies as a crude form of evasiveness (i.e. acting “twelve”), but I’m trying to be fair to you and allow that I may have misread. So I’m giving you a chance to state your actual position, and to deliver a radical smackdown to me if indeed…
Let’s try it this way: Are there any views I’ve attributed to you that are inaccurate? If so, how so?
Circa mid-century we famously absorbed large numbers of traumatized Jewish refugees “from war zones.” How many machete murders did they commit?
lol are you twelve?
Maybe I misread you. Do you oppose admission of the current flood of MENA migrants to the EU?