They impeached him twice and just wrapped up an investigation where they recommended DOJ bring charges.

Definitely feel the reactions tracked pretty closely to whether you’ve been in a physical altercation since middle school, haha.

In the fall, I ran into a guy who had slapped me in the face at a bar a couple years before.

It’s hard to read a lot of these comments mischaracterizing the Slap as “assault” or “decking,” insisting that it’s “against the law,” and not conclude that people just really wanted to see a black man get arrested. 

Counterpoint:

This is seriously a strong candidate for the biggest self-own in the history of Twitter. The tweet where Greta crushed him is one of the most liked tweets ever on Twitter, and then on top of that he helped get himself trying to do a thoroughly bad reply! What a wild thing to happen. 

Seems he’ll be going to prison precisely because he has a hard time letting teenagers go.

you think you’re not exposing your editorial opinion because it’s not explicitly stated. but readers are not criticizing the text of what you’ve written, but rather the germinal ideas and curatorial process that drew you to certain determinations to begin with.

My theory is she threw it in there to lead some credence to the idea that she had actually seen the movie.   Her whole premise (You can’t have a movie all about obtaining guns and then claim you don’t want to fetishize guns) is not a description of the movies plot or themes - at all.   There is a single scene in the…

I think we watched different movies.

Because a lot of authors don’t need to put spoilers in their article when talking about the themes of the movie. And putting a spoiler alert on your article takes hardly any time and shows actual respect for your readers instead of your snide comment. 

It’s actually incredibly common in sexually abused children to act outwardly sexual at an inappropriately young age. And Googling it, Thorne was indeed sexually abused from age 9-14 according to her. Reporting that sort of behavior (if that’s the case) to her parents seems correct and not what a pedo would do.

Doesn’t help when your sister site Jezebel runs a already debunked hit piece to try and smear Henry Cavill, as well as adding in their own pathetic lines to add to the faux drama. And then when the source turns out to be bullshit, Jezebel pulls the article and doesn’t run a retraction or apology.

Yes, I’m aware she didn’t actually say that, and she’s deliberately giving an extreme example, but that extreme example makes the opposite point of what she intended. You can say it’s “never okay to sexualize a child” but if a child actually is behaving inappropriately (and we don’t know specifically what she did in…

Gosh, I still haven’t gotten over Gen Z’s snide entitlement masking itself as woke righteousness.

I realize it’s not the same thing at all, but I was a college teacher for a good portion of my life and I’ve had many a 17- or 18-year-old (of any gender) make extremely graphic sexual passes at me and, believe me, it is both shocking and terrifying, in no small part because you’re aware who will be believed if it…

If a child says “Eat my pussy right now” in an audition, you definitely should not cast that child and should tell their parent they were behaving inappropriately. Of course, we don’t know what she actually did in the audition, and perhaps the director really was being unreasonable, but I think any reasonable person…

What happened to the Henry Cavill post? Y'all took it down already?