Apparently I absolutely did.

I’m just stuck on the fact that Sylvie can use her magic in the TVA now. Is this part of the whole “TVA is crumbling” thing, or are we just supposed to accept the show is no longer following its own rules?

I haven’t seen the movie yet but I’m really hoping he’s doing like a Foghorn Leghorn type blowhard voice the whole time. “BOY - I SAY BOY” etc.

He even claims that it was “too much confidence for too little skill.” That reads to me like he thinks there’s a level of skill where lanesplitting and weaving through traffic at 100+ miles per hour could ever be done safely.

“Too much confidence for too little skill.” Maybe just don’t drive or ride like a huge asshole and cause dangerous conditions for everyone? Is there a skill level where it would be safe to do this type of high speed lane splitting amongst unpredictable traffic?

ok

Ugh, I’m sure it’s mandated or something, but these 40 slide slideshows are exhausting to even try to click through, even if I wanted to.

More like a law to make it illegal to TRAVEL to play 7 card stud with bigfoot. You can technically pull anyone over under suspicion of going to play a card game with a cryptid. And oh, if you were to find (or plant) some evidence of some other crime, well that’s just icing on the cake.

I’m liking the look of the Mazda, Subaru, and Honda concepts. Less so the seemingly Cybertruck inspired polygons on the Nissan and Lexus (and Toyota to a lesser extent).

See also - Twitter under Musk.

Rarely if ever do these additional markups equal 40% of the total original sticker price. The posts above detail $30,000 in pricing adjustments. That’s roughly the cost of a new economy car.

Interestingly my paycheck has not increased one cent since the Cybertruck was first announced.

It’d look pretty bad for Tesla to admit a lack of demand caused them to shutter the Cybertruck considering how much they’ve touted the two million preorders...

Yeah, these laws seem either A) completely unenforceable, or B) totally open to abuse.

God you’re insufferable.

EVERYONE has “skeletons in their closet” because nobody is a perfect unblemished example who appeals to absolutely everyone. 

Your question assumes some mythical candidate who is equal in every way except somehow has no skeletons in their closet. Some “perfect candidate” who is exactly the same but DIDN’T make consensual decisions with their spouse that you somehow find objectionable. 

It’s a strawman question based on a hypothetical without basis in reality so...

But then they whine that people wanna pay with old fashioned cash and want to slap a fee on that too.

“Why should the business take the impact of your choice of payment?”