Those motors aren't intended for street use. One is for marine applications and the other requires 110 octane gasoline. Not to mention the fact that they're both carburated.
Those motors aren't intended for street use. One is for marine applications and the other requires 110 octane gasoline. Not to mention the fact that they're both carburated.
Not on that engine cover, it's not. And don't even get me started on the idea of clear-coating this sort of patina. It just screams poser to me.
You mean like the crisis in the Ukraine, the Israeli/Hamas conflict, Ebola, and young black men getting gunned down in American cities? The Crew not getting ported to PS3 is hardly a tragedy, nor is it worth all your impotent rage and misdirected anger. Like I said, Ubisoft is a business, they can do whatever the hell…
I'm not a real big fan of the whole "patina" thing, especially when it's faked.
You know what? I don't care. I don't care about this game. I don't care what their reasons are for not porting it to PS3. I don't care that you're so butt hurt about it. If they don't want to port it to PS3, that's their business. You need to stop freaking out about it; more important things are going on in the world.
I'm not the one ignoring the PS3; Ubisoft is. And apparently you're really upset about that. Perhaps you should spend your time trying to convince them to port this game to PS3, and not wasting it trying to make me care.
You apparently know nothing about the "big picture" of economics or business. Ubisoft looked at the costs of porting The Crew to PS3 and the potential sales and decided it wasn't worth it. They did the same thing with Assassins Creed and decided it was. One is an established franchise with a huge, devoted fanbase, the…
Like I said, I'm no tech guru, and you just spouted off a bunch of stuff that I have zero interest in knowing. What I do know is that the PS3 is harder to develop for, based in part on its less-conventional architecture.
But porting the game to PS3 probably just isn't worth it.
I'm a Mac owner and I've never once gotten defensive about my Mac's lack of gaming ability. I use my Mac for computer stuff and my 360 for gaming stuff, like a normal person :P
I'm by no means a tech guru, but the PS3's cell architecture is quite a bit different from the 360, which is pretty much just a standard PC. Sony went a more conventional route with the PS4 in an effort to make things easier for developers and hopefully get more games.
PS4 version? So this is no longer a Microsoft published/supported property?
You're taking this way too seriously. All the pink, bubbly, girly stuff is just meant to be an extreme contrast to the Iron-Crossy, Kaiser's army stuff from the first Toy Soldiers game. Frickin' relax.
I'd like to point out that this game's existence was already confirmed yesterday in Kotaku's Deal's post:
So many commenters are missing this point of this question, which is about morally questionable games, not games that freaked you out. For me, that would be GTA Vice City. I understand that the game offers a form of escapism and fantasy-fulfillment, but I couldn't shake the feeling that a lot of what I was doing was…
I agree with this so much. Whenever I hear developers talk about how "Big" their game's map is I immediately think of all the time I'll be wasting just trying to get from one point to the next. I also think that making a big map is probably the only idea they had for the game.
Actually, during World War 2, it was the Brits who were pretty good at killing civilians. They gave up on daylight bombing and decided to instead bomb cities at night. It was the American Air Force that took up the challenge of daylight bombing and completely destroyed German industry. Americans were also the ones who…
I don't really want to get into a debate about who did what during the war, but reducing our "war effort" to lives lost and property destroyed is pretty dumb. I'd like to think that all the tanks, bombers, ships, bullets, artillery shells, food and strategic materials we supplied to the entire allied cause is a much…
No Audi makes for a bad list.
Um, Grand Prix racing and Land Speed records in the 1930s. Completely re-invented rally racing (and the production car) with Quattro in the 1980s. So good in the American Trans-Am series the Quattros were banned after embarrassing the competition, then went and did the same thing in IMSA competition. Won the Pikes…