Lol, you are nuts. I am literally an Ivy League-educated lawyer, you know, a legal expert, but okay. Wade’s claims were thrown out due to the expiration of the statute of limitations—no ruling whatsoever was made on the merits of his claims. I’m not unaware, but you clearly are uninformed.

I said it’s illegal to knowingly publish false information as facts to the masses

You’re really dumb. You cannot defame a dead person. Defamation is an offense against one’s reputation. Dead people don’t need to depend on reputations, ergo, you cannot defame a dead person.

Now that MJ is no longer here Wade has had his recent lies already debunked by a jury.

Based on the subject matter of the hobby, I feel like if you know one swinger (and know they are one), you’ll soon know several swingers.

I understand what you are saying, but no, these women absolutely were heroes, because their partners became monsters to them and others with no explanation. It has nothing particularly to do with the fact that their partners were CSA survivors that makes the wives heroes. It’s that, in the face of absolute uncertainty…

This is a great video that I’ve referred to a bunch in the last decade:

Don’t watch that shit.  I’m fucking pissed that I did. Fuck that guy.

At least Neeson admitted his thoughts were wrong and he never acted on them

Nope. You have to take legal tender for debts public or private. Food service does not fall into that debt category, because there is no pre-existing relationship, and a business that accepts payment concurrent with providing a good or service can set policies about what they will accept as payment.

I mean, yes and no. You’d have to have the specific amount of those ingredients (having to purchase them at a higher per unit cost) or buy and store larger amount of those ingredients for your individual salads to get them down to the $3/bowl ingredients-only cost.

Thanks for reading.

And, to be clear, OF COURSE individual choices matter to outcomes of a person’s life. I didn’t get where I am by not working for it, but my choices did not give me a break from oppression. I might not have faced the same instances of oppression that someone with a lower income and less education would face, but that’s…

I’d rather him start by saying, “Look, you, individually, cannot change society’s view of you, as a black man. I am sorry that is the case, but it is.” Then, I’d like him say something like, “The best revenge against that oppression is living your life as fully as you can. The effects of oppression will bear down on…

YES! 

Individual choices of young black men HAVE NO BEARING on society’s view of black men as a whole, and to argue otherwise is incredibly disingenuous and suggests that if we all pull our pants up or some bullshit, society won’t oppress us. That’s 100% bullshit.

I actually do think it was a scold, because it presumes that young black men can actually change society’s perception of them, which we absolutely cannot do individually, nor as a group. It’s actually quite a gross answer, because it puts the onus on the victims of oppression to get society to stop oppressing them.…

You literally didn’t ask any questions.

If one MAGA hat sees this film and is elightented 10% more than they were, I don’t get how this is a bad thing.

MY grandmother’s grandparents were both slaves. I’m not even 30!