nothowtmswork
That's not how TMs work
nothowtmswork

I doubt this is the first red flag.

The latter.

I think you mean heartburn.

Or complimentary.

Your explanation misses some nuance. It was canned because the formula used to determine which states had to pre-clear changes was, in so many words, too old. So, theoretically, if COTUS came up with new formula, pre-clearance could apply to those same set of states—i.e. not all states would need to be covered in

Why did you just clown yourself like that? You know you can read:

Wait, what? How does that make the NYT look stupid if they are ultimately right? 

lol

Nah. Under SCOTUS doctrine, “true threats” have to be specific enough to be unambiguous in order for the speech to fall outside of constitutional protections. Saying you know where someone sleeps while standing in front of their house isn’t actually threatening anything—it’s simply stating a fact from which many

I mean, MT was not Hitler, but she was pretty fucking shitty. 

AND having to hope The General and Shaq give her a way overpriced policy

I was listening watching some performance of hers on youtube and a single word comment there has been spontaneously cracking me up for the last few days every time I see her name:

I mean, yeah, everyone hates middlemen until they want to be a middleman.

That “sense of belonging to something larger...and believing [political] action would directly benefit you and your community” was because of patronage and corruption and the sense of fear that came with being an individual bucking against that all-powerful system. And, those direct benefits to the communication usuall

I’m holding out hope.  It doesn’t say why the mother can’t take care of the daughter, and to me, all the reasons you listed could qualify as reasons she can’t take care of the daughter. *crossing fingers*

Weird, I wonder what that piece of paper Penn gave me is then.

Lol, no.  If you have a law degree, you deserve a refund.

Okay, but under that mess, he’s kinda hot.