While Harper is an arrogant dickbag quite often, I would not blame him in the slightest for demanding a trade if Papelbon is still on the 40-man roster tomorrow.

“[B]ounces off” is a very curious way of describing how he clips the blonde in his bull-rush to the stands. It doesn’t take a high degree of empathy to see that he made no effort to either slow down or adjust course to avoid hurting anyone in the “mass of people” he didn’t particularly need to run through.

Particularly egregious is the decision to halfheartedly hurdle her, as though a D-I WR doesn’t have the agility to navigate past the cheerleaders.

Dear God just let this season end already. At least the Caps reliably make the playoffs before breaking my heart.

While prosecutors have complained for years about the “CSI effect,” all of the empirical work aimed at detecting it has been unable to detect a statistically significant effect.

Could you point to where that has been reported? I haven’t seen anything on that.

If the mother were the only person being dishonest here, that wouldn’t be grounds for dropping the client without their permission.

The leaked reports were that there was evidence found on her shoulder and under her fingernails—which can occur through mere casual contact—but none in or around her genital area. If true, that evidence would weigh in favor of Kane’s innocence.

I took the NY Bar a few months ago and then proceeded to try to clear all the info out of my brain through alcohol, so this is a bit hazy, but NY ethics rules don’t permit an attorney to drop a client simply because the chances of winning are slim. There’s a complicating factor here in that there is currently no…

Neither the best evidence rule nor double jeopardy doctrine applies here. The problem with the evidence tampering is a matter of whether there is evidence at all, not what the best form of that evidence is, and since no charges have been filed (much less submitted to a jury) jeopardy hasn’t attached.

It’s a clear case of witness intimidation.

In fairness, you seem to have no clue what it means “to raze,” so glass houses and all that.

Maybe it’s a reassuring sign that there are simply some atrocities that a hacker will not commit

Odd choice, but I guess Lombardi wanted someone who would be able to focus exclusively on the WC without playing favorites among the players based on any dual loyalties.

Bernie supports GMO labeling.

Only as serious as Burnenko was in the first place, promise.

Well, let’s see, we’ll have:

Dissolve the United States, replacing it with a set of city-states, villages, and thinly-peopled hinterlands; let every public that wants one have their own Carly Fiorina or Bobby Jindal, and let everyone else go about their business. The candidate who proposes that will be the one to get behind.

Gawker policy is to prioritize liberal politics over all else.

::wants to say something, but doesn’t want to bother anyone::