Saying something was "released by 4Chan" is like saying a youtube video was "released by Google". They are a medium and server for the information provided by some random user.
Better to say "hosted by 4chan"
NotABurnerAtAll
notaburneratall
This is the first time I've seen a picture of Joan Rivers in a red wig.
How much time could it possibly take to make the same shit up over and over again?
About the response I'd expect from people who literally think the universe revolves around them.
She should have seen it coming.
Well someone would actually have to get a match on tinder for this to happen, which in my experience has been impossible.
Is all security advice problematic, or only a subset?
Is it victim blaming when people post articles about better password security?
Last night, as I was falling asleep, I made a mental list of all the opinions I have that the Jez collective hive mind would find "problematic." I'm gonna add this one to the list.
When I take nakies I tend to avoid putting my face in them so I have plausible deniability. Who knows if this girl is going to be a creeper?
I am officially an old, because I think "Don't take naked pictures of yourself" happens to be pretty good advice for everyone, male or female. I can't imagine all those sports players who had their dicks posted on Deadspin really liked that experience either.
I forgot about that one. Jezebel actually posted pictures of a woman being raped. After being roundly criticized for victimizing the poor woman a second time they pixelated the images, but at least looking at it now I don't see any apology from them and I'm sure they didn't return or donate any of the ad money they…
Did Gawker Media return the pageview money for that Hulk Hogan sex tape? Or the video of a rape victim?
What about Jezebel linking to leaked photos of Brett Favres' penis? You guys covered that story for weeks and gawker media even hosted video of his cock pictures. Apparently it's OK to titter over celebrity nudes if they're of a man.
Please research the way that Deadspin covered this, right down to the incredibly creepy and disgusting timeline in regards to Justin Verlander and Kate Upton, which timeline they used geo-data to create. Gawker does not have a leg to stand on in this one.
What a small fig leaf to hide behind.
Probably the same thing that gawker did with the money that they made from posting nudes and links to nudes of kat dennings, scarlett johannsen, christina hendricks, vanessa hudgens, hulk hogan, etc.
Surely, Ms. Faircloth, you feel the same way about Jezebel's parent company, Gawker media.