Funny, I don’t see anyone questioning the validity of this so-called scientific study. Vaxer’s, of course, never question.
Funny, I don’t see anyone questioning the validity of this so-called scientific study. Vaxer’s, of course, never question.
Hypochondria is a known mental illness.
I see the sheep are out to graze in force. Nothing safer than group think.
This is the biggest vaccine-advocaing bullshit I have ever read :-)
The other correlation is in the actual study - and that is that those unvaccinated are actually younger and drink more. That’s the actual connection to bad driving - not being unvaccinated. To say that this article is science, is a stretch to say the least.
As a 53 years old male in good health why would I take a shot? I do remember Biden and Kamala pre election telling us the would not be taking it. No accidents but plenty of speeding tickets.
You aren’t wrong about that. I’ve never driven one, but from what I’ve seen over the years on Top Gear and such, AMGs have always been straight line monsters...not corner carvers.
I could be wrong, but that’s the impression I’ve always had.
100% agree. Precisely why I ditched an ecoboost raptor in exchange for a slower, heavier, thirstier, lower luxury/tech features first gen with the 6.2.
I’m not mad about losing the V8 in AMG offerings, but to pretend like AMG has ever truly put an emphasis on handling and driving dynamics is a bit of a laugh.
Not sure about that. See the reaction that enthusiasts had to the 4-cylinder turbocharged 718 Boxster and Cayman, which were much faster than their flat six predecessors. This reaction almost certainly led to Porsche giving the GTS the 4.0 naturally aspirated 6-cylinder.
I agree on all points but the “no one wants to live with one day in and day out” part. I think if you polled actual C63 buyers, most would want the V8 given everything else being equal. Just a guess though.
From a purely logical and objective standpoint, I get it. I do. I’m not mad about losing the V8, or about the weight, or the hybrid system, and I understand the thing is an absolute monster from the reviews I’ve seen. It’s the future, and we all need to be ok with change.
late 98s sebring convertible. it was hilarious how s low this car was. I hope something was wrong with the engine but it drove like a battleship. It felt like it took 12 seconds to get to 50mph i don’t think it ever made it to 60 while we were driving it.
Worst car is like worst movie, so the absolute shitboxes don’t count- the $300 beetle that was my first car, the Chevy Monza that replaced it... c’mon, these are the “plan 9 from outer space of cars”- no one would expect greatness.
So that leaves me with the Isuzu Amigo. The Amigo was... complicated. On the one hand,…
For all it’s charm, unfortunately it was a 1974 Land-Rover Series III 88.
Did not make it out of the dealer parking lot on a test drive
Sadly the brown rwd manual wagon doesn't fit the wants and needs of the current crop of jalops. Now they all want EVs or public transport.
Okay Jalops, I say we pool our money to keep Borgward alive, once in control we can then build nothing but brown manual rear wheel drive station wagons!
Jalopnik Editorial Meeting: How can we get a clickbait Kanye post up? Blackstock: I got this.
I’m more concerned at the bias towards Ham the FIA showed with that collision between him and Ver early on. Driver has a pass set up the turn before and is even on the inside on the next turn. Ham forces max up on the curbing and turn into his car at the apex forcing the collision. The FIA then hands Max a penalty...…