Feminists as a community tend to have a terrible habit of least charitable interpretations when it comes to interacting with people they disagree with, so don’t get all huffy puffy when your own tactics annoy you when you’re on the receiving end.

Using this logic, feminists think men are their property since they seem fine with forcing men to work for 18 years to provide for their choice.

No. there are comments on this article that are hateful, hating people because of their ideas about issues, and then you tell me that the left is tolerant of ideas. It’s a total joke.

As for the GOP comment, think of it like this, if someone put a gun to your head and said would you rather lose a hand or a foot and you…

I’d honestly rather live in a country ruled by the GOP platform than by democrats and the left. But I’m not a republican, don’t get it twisted.

Also examples? have you READ the comments on this very article? Holy shit you must be willingly blind.

Because the left screams about tolerance, but is exceptionally intolerant. Then they justify it by saying some ideas are inherently intolerant even when they’re not.

Also the “transwomen are male rapists” idea seems to be more prevalent in rape hysteria soaked radical feminists than on the right, at least in my…

“As for explaining why you shouldn’t be selfish, because you don’t live in a vacuum. Really? I think you’re being deliberately obtuse. It isn’t a difficult connection to make, unless you don’t want to make it.”

What a useful way to avoid answering the question. Also, calling me a toddler IS shaming language.

you haven’t explained how the fact that I don’t live in a vacuum implies that selfishness is wrong. You just use shaming language, and as I said earlier, shaming language is ineffectual against me.

Why does the fact that I don’t live in a vacuum go to demonstrate that it is wrong to be selfish?

Also, I explained how calling someone else selfish is in itself, a selfish act, so how can selfishness be wrong?

Yes, I do not believe there ought to be any anti discrimination laws and yes, I know why lefties believe them to be good, necessary, righteous and whatever.

The left has called me a torrent of names for opinions like this, even though there is nothing prejudicial about such an opinion. Hell, on the face of it, it might…

How does this rebut anything I have said? Also where did I say I lived in a vacuum? Where did I say anything that implies this, or necessitates this to be true for my argument? Where did you get this from if not from the depths of your ass?

Oh you!

as an example of the absurdity of people of your position, I, as a transwoman, have been called transphobic, because I do not believe that there should be laws against discrimination (for instance, discrimination based on gender identity).

This is an example of what I mean when I say lefties want tolerance of…

No matter how many times you say it, a lot of people on a certain side of the isle don’t understand: “tolerance” is about demographics, the left won’t tolerate different ideas at all. In fact they’re bigots when it comes to the subject.

So voting for a candidate you believe will save you a few dollars on taxes is selfish, but voting for a candidate that will use taxes stolen from others to pay you benefits isn’t selfish?

Also, remind me, whats wrong with being selfish? It strikes me so odd that ‘selflessness’ is an ideal. Why should any individual put…

“the luxury of having sex with me”
heh. okay.

Anyways, it blows my mind that people view democrats and republicans as fundamentally different.

Both just want to use state violence to enforce their preferences on others, with slightly different preferences. Neither has a solid political ideology, neither has any…

Heh. But lefties are all willfully stupid and support for instance lets say... violent appropriation of money from some people, to their pet causes like planned parenthood.

You would think if you were compassionate you would be able to see why the other side is upset, they are being forced, against their will (I…

feminists love to think they speak on behalf of all women.

I strawmanned in the first place?

What I had said was that feminists are concerned with getting more women in tech industries. This is true, this is what the article is about.

And they are concerned with such because of “gender equality”, do you deny this?

It then follows that feminists SHOULD also be concerned with…

Maybe they use it every time because you strawman every time. For instance, I have said nothing about anything you said I said.

Also deflecting? You’re the one deflecting.

perhaps because you are very clearly strawmanning?

Holy fucking strawmans batman!