I’m not suggesting anyone only vote for a perfect candidate.

Accepting Democrats doing things that are wrong because they’re not more wrong than Republicans is exactly why Democrats get candidates who do things that are wrong. They face no consequences.

Again, auditors are not tasked with enforcing rules. And where are you getting that they knew about this before this particular audit? Which previous audit did they conduct that discovered what happened in the past?

I do not think the private email server investigation is a sexist attack.

Did they all use private servers, though?

So did Condoleeza Rice’s, then.

The report notes that others in the position did the same thing, including Colin Powell, but it does make the distinction that they primarily used official email for official business and used private email to a varying degree, while Clinton only used private email and was the only one to set up her own server. I know…

“The report said that Clinton should have discussed that decision with departmental security officials. Clinton’s decision, the inspector general concluded, presented“security risks” that were unacceptable to the department.”

Considering that she told Abedin she set it up to avoid FOIA requests, that seems kind of obvious

Some choice excerpts:

So she’s the same as Condoleeza Rice, then?

Yes, it’s all a giant conspiracy against Hillary Clinton because she’s a woman.

*Those who proceeded her used personal e-mail. I believe she is unique in using the personal server.

Did they all use private servers, though? The summary makes it sound like they’ve all been lax on record keeping, but that Hillary using the private server was unique to her.

Probably because she thinks she's above it all and nothing applies to her? Just spitballing here.

Blood on the office carpet draws a lot more attention than blood in a slaughterhouse.

But but but she isn’t a Clinton running for president! We need higher to implement higher standards to justify our dislike of some people!

or the fact that she’s actually served in public office, thus has a history to even discuss....

Nothing says toothless investigation like declined to be interviewed.