He's not a 'good' player, but this is the best I've ever seen Boyle play. And I've seen him play way too much.

Quick question- have you watched the SCF games? 3/4 of the games were essentially dead even, and the one game the rangers got thoroughly outplayed, they won...

Only the Rangers could get 3 wins from the Cup and generate this much derision. Maybe they're the reason Pitt imploded? And maybe Boston should have gotten their heads out of their asses and beaten Montreal.

The butt-hurt is strong with this one...

No mention of Boyle (who is the best PKer, and gives some extra oomph to the 3rd of 4th line), or Dominik Moore. This would further help prove your article.

Na pinta da tua mae.

Occupy Wall Street (International)

Just a suggestion, but maybe hire a Portuguese translator for the month. That was painful to read. I'm sure you can pick one up in Newark for pretty cheap...

Of course a $64,000 dinner tab is fake. Everyone knows Andy Reid doesn't coach the Eagles anymore.

God no. The Inside Crew is great where they are. Webber is good as a game analyst and as an Inside analyst. I never want to see that crew ruined by ESPN and it's bullshit.

Eh, can the lot of them and poach Charles, Ernie and Kenny. AND BRING BACK FUCKING CHRIS WEBBER, BECAUSE EVERYONE IN THE WORLD LOVES WEBBER.

The Kings are, generally, better than the Rangers, no doubt. If they played 100 times, I've no doubt the Kings would win 60. But they have not been any better (or really, worse) than the Rangers over these four games. Games 1 and 2 were as even as can be, and games 3 and 4 were dominated by the losing team.

That's a trend – their overall body of work indicates that they are superior and over a larger sample should win. An individual occurrence, like a single shot being stopped millimeters from crossing the goal line due to shaved ice, is luck because it's effectively a random outcome.

Luck is really just a word for causal determinism on a level too micro for us to measure. A puck bounces a certain way or a player loses an edge in a crucial moment because of high-level collision physics, not because of true randomness.

Yes the Kings are better, but they've led in regulation for all of 40 minutes and 1 second. It's not as lopsided as people make it out to be. Probably should be a 2-2 series. (Back to back losses with 2 goal leads is pretty rare)

I don't think anyone believes "luck" somehow is outside the laws of "high-level collision physics", but rather, the manner in which the "high-level collision physics" occurred and benefited one team significantly over the other, was lucky. Such as, how lucky was it for the snow fort to be at that exact place at that…

I call shenanigans.

Luck is also the NFL's shitty beard dump.

You know NOTHING, pile of snow.

That's one more dick than Chris Christie sees in a day.