nixons-back
Nixon's Back!
nixons-back

Quite honestly, there’s Charlie Work, and then there’s everything else.

Because we would be multiplying 1,000 times the brightness value of the Milky Way.

lmao at if-so-facto

only one player was targeted by officials last night, and that was Josh Jackson. (T for saying “call the foul”, which is said roughly 25 times a game)

This reminds me of everyone constantly correcting each others’ pronunciation of Nevada on VEEP this past season.

I think Kaine’s aggression was strategic. A few people on Twitter pointed out last night that he sacrificed his own likability in order to carry out the Clinton campaign’s objective: remind viewers of what a tremendous dick Trump is. That’s why he kept quoting Trump’s hateful remarks toward women, minorities, and

Curt hasn’t been this invested in a trainwreck since 38 Studios.

I thought about it and then I saw it wanted me to create a log in and that seemed more effort then its worth so I gave up. Guess that means my patronus is something really lazy.

I love that the people replying to me don’t realize they are the entertainment.

A climate change article on Gizmodo? This should be good.

Not being a jerk, just genuinely curious since I don’t know much about the law, but since the suit was dismissed with prejudice, and (at least Burke claims) it can’t be re-filed legally, how was it still a liability?

I really think part of the problem is that conservatives don’t see the difference between protest and a tantrum.

This guys is throwing a tantrum. And he thinks it’s protest. Which, I think, explains why he doesn’t take protest seriously. In his mind what Marshall is doing is the same thing. His impulse to “protest” is

“As part of a brazen scheme to claim Palantir’s own highly confidential information and trade secrets as his own, Abramowitz stole those secrets, engaged in methodical deception of Palantir’s senior executives, and made false claims to the United States Patent and Trademark Office,”

Because when you want hard-hitting perspective about how the world really works, you go to a 24 year old blond who's putting together an audition reel for a sweet FoxNews gig.

All closing the foundation would do is prove to the right wing that they were right and it was corrupt. Meanwhile, a shit load of people would suffer and lots of good programs would stop.

But many of these people were people she would have met with already, money or no money. The list of 85 people includes multiple Nobel Peace Prize winners, Ben Affleck and George Clooney (who unfortunately get lots of access in Washington for their activist activities already), etc.

Seriously? You couldn’t turn on the news for the past year without hearing something about Clinton’s emails. The result of which is no criminal wrongdoing. The CLinton Foundation has similarly been in the news lately, and again, no one’s found anything criminally wrong. Even the so called “pay for access” accounts

Please quote the part of my very short post where I talked about what was or was not reasonable.