Man, the world would be such a nicer place if idiots bothered to read and learn things before talking or just shut the fuck up, you know?

In a country where there seems to be a tech answer for most any problem, there hasn’t yet been one for this. (There are a few in development.)

Living in this century helps.... lol

What parent is not looking in the backseat when driving with a kid?

Not really?

I went back and re-read the original post and you are very clearly reading into it in a way that was obviously not the intent.

So, like, he holds meetings by himself?

Your analogy still centers you as the provider of the orgasm (or “painting” in your example—and kudos for conflating the idea of lovemaking with artistry; that is some capital S self-congratulation if you’re serious). For an awful lot of women, the orgasm isn’t about the penis (assuming heteronormative penetrative…

So it is unreasonable for a painter to feel pride when someone loves their art? Okay there, bud.

You need to be paying better attention. I was having a conversation with someone else about a general concept, not this one case in particular. None of your rambling post has any actual bearing on my conversation.

No and No. So, with that information, what’s your answer?

Well. You are fucking stupid.

Scotsman doesn’t have a clear definition? Its definition is less clear than feminism?

Hey, look. Found a second one, too!

If I am a painter and you commissioned a work from me, it is your painting. That said, I obviously have an interest in doing good work. And if you hated the painting, I would feel bad about that.

Yeah, that’s about the level of discourse / intelligence I expected.

Really? There are no feminists that are against sex?

Well, if I had missed that, it would obviously be because it isn’t on this page. Duh.

This isn’t hard:

I’ve got to admit. This is the first time I’ve heard someone who drives more than they ride and who rides a goddamn citibike call themselves road warrior cyclists.