But so much more expensive!

Bingo! I have a charcoal bbq. Yesterday, my wife asked me to cook a steak so she could cut it up and put it on our salad (Diet, yeah). Well, putting on 5 bucks worth of charcoal just so that I can cook a single steak would be pretty expensive!

Well no, I’m a lazy good-for-nothing. I’m the exemplar of “meh, good enough.”

“I’m probably like 160 pounds right now and chubby chasers exist, fuck yeah!”

Wait, what? “meh, good enough, just give up now, don’t strive for perfection” is good advice? Whatever happened to “reach for the stars” or some such?

How is “the advertising was tantamount to fraud” not a good reason for a refund??

I wouldn’t put Cersei in the list of capable. :)

And I still lost interest in the show because of meandering plots going nowhere. I can’t imagine how bad the books are.

No, he outright said it was his previous master.

Yes. Which is what makes blanket statements like “Trail running probably does prevent injury” misleading. At best, you could write “Trail running probably does prevent some types of injury”.

Sure today makes sense. To us. On the other hand, if you are one of the capitalists (ie the people in position to actually make that choice) you’d be singing a different tune.

Because that way, when you get your ass to the doctor thinking you have at least 18 different cancers in each body part, you can only be pleasantly surprised.

Isn’t it far more useful to talk about ALL injuries? Concentrating on one type while saying things like “Trail running probably does prevent injury” is misleading, at best.

LOL. Keep digging the pit of stupidity. Well, at least you’ve started to read. Maybe by 2017, you’ll have finished it and figured out why you’re wrong.

Nah, its the Catch-22 aspect that is fucked up. You are only allowed to see thing thing if you know before hand what it says.

Its ‘B’, dipshit.

That’s hella fucked up. Nice police state you’re helping to make there, buddy.

What’s on my wishlist for iOS9?

Oh, wait. You are still operating under the delusion that what you said was correct?

Ah, so the reason that you went ahead and repeated one of the myths this article was trying to debunk wasn’t because you chose not to read information sitting right there in front of your face. (The definition of willfully ignorant) But rather, you knew exactly what it is you were saying and you were purposely trying…