nitePhyyre
Shane
nitePhyyre

'How long has the company been here' is privileged company info at your work? That's utterly bizarre.

And he needs to start holding the woman in his life accountable for her own gratification by asking her to tell him what she needs to get turned on.

Ah, gotcha. You'd think that type of thing is clearly unconstitutional, but hey. What can you do?

What show is that?

There's a pretty big difference between "a few demerit points" and "have my license suspended or be put in jail".

IMO, it would behove you to avoid that entire legal system like the plague. Yikes!

Wow. Somebody is extremely defensive. Calling you a hipster isn't like calling you a Klan member or some such. Clam down.

The argument is essentially that all humans get a pass on being a person.

Consider this: Many of us who enjoy out Vinyl collection grew up listening to Vinyl, there's an individual uniqueness to each persons Vinyl that no CD can ever match, in that every one of them, over time, will develop it's own sort of personality. There are things that I cannot unlink in my mind from years of playing

I don't think I've heard that argument before. Its the only good argument for vinyl I've ever heard. It isn't a 'better' product, it is a more 'fun' product.

Can I get it to work with whatsapp rather than SMS?

I didn't know this until recently but picked up the tip watching Canada's Worst Drivers.

Ok, I hate Apple more than most, but the iPod classic was phenomenal. Trust me, I bought every 'iPod-killer' that ever came out.

The note 4 is the same size and has a 14 day stand-by battery life with the ultra power saver mode turned on.

Yeah, I thought that too. Then I actually used an android devices. Oh, how wrong I was.

Would a layer of aluminium foil be a counter measure?

How can a periodic flushing of your pipes not be good for you?

Just because I point out how ungodly stupid your position is, it doesn't make me a troll. Instead of just calling someone who points out your stupidity a troll, trying thinking up a coherent defense of your ideas.

I get what you're trying to say here, but I think I agree with DTurkin. You're trying to argue the fringes, you're building quite a pretty straw-man, and I think you're purposefully trying to obfuscate the argument by adding in a lot of unnecessary qualifications.

Oh, I read it correctly. I just ignored the the if clause because including it means you are begging the question, introducing a no true scotsman fallacy, and because it is fucking stupid. Imagine that.