Because if they didn't do that they would be forced to actually engage on the merit of their ideas. Most people don't feel comfortable realizing their ideas are silly.

To have to audacity to ask whether you've critically considered your beliefs means that he's "drank the koolaid"?

So either he is writing an essay, or he's a dick? STFU you fucking tard.

That is very true. It is why you have Muslims going out on fatwas while other declare that Islam is the Religion of Peace. Christianity is no different. Worshipping someone titled The Prince of Peace didn't stop anyone from launching crusades or inquisitions.

There are tons more. One of the biggest has to be Jesus's views on following the old laws and justice.

Why am I here? What is my purpose? What is the meaning of existence?

Now you've gone from ignorant ghettos to either, open-air prison camp, apartheid, or gulag - depending on exact implementation details.

Are you saying that in the game there are missions with options and you can fail the mission? That would actually be pretty neat, IMO.

I think the government should be more proactive in using eminent domain. They should use those powers to strip the X-men properties from Fox and Spider-man from Sony. Give/Sell it back to Marvel.

Ltd made a legal claim about how the law would view the theft of photos:

That's ok. Unfortunately, no one can make anybody else take a look outside their echo chambers. No one can force you to think if you really don't want to.

Ok, considering that I basically quoted you only replacing "rape room with "spaceship" we both agree that "If the nickname of that room is the rape room then yes, they definitely have a rape room." was a fucking stupid thing to say? Good, carry on.

What? That's not true at all. If you're walking down the street alone at night and someone comes up quickly behind you and you jump to move out of their way and they were just jogging, you are delusional?

That's the brilliance of the common law system. The law does not have to be re-codified every time the world changes. Precedents from previous cases can be applied to new situations. Do you think naked photos were never stolen before the invention of the internet? This isn't earth shattering to the legal field. The…

Like I already said, just because the law does not yet considered it a sex crime doesn't mean that it's not sexually motivated and sexually harassing. You're really focused on the way the law looks at things, and my point is that there's obviously more to it than that. The purpose of stealing the photos is entirely…

There is a difference between being unsafe and feeling unsafe. If you feel unsafe but are in fact safe, you are delusional.

Wait, so if I give my bathroom the nickname "spaceship" I definitely have a spaceship? That's AWESOME!!! Screw you guys, I'm going to mars!

It isn't that absurd. Companies often try to create a culture in their workplaces. If someone doesn't like your jokes, it could be because they don't fit into your company's culture. Assuming that trying to have people who fit in and work well together isn't absurd on its face, it makes perfect sense to fire someone…

If we're talking about men making jokes they wouldn't make in front of women, it's probably one of two things. Either the jokes are legitimately sexist, and the men who don't feel comfortable making those jokes in front of most women should probably reconsider whether those are okay jokes to make in the first place. Or…

Logic like: This image has no meaning outside of proving that the creator sucks at rigging?