Here is another article from the Nazi New York times that describes the damage this kind of garbage is doing to society:

I regret to inform you all that David French has weighed in. Mostly he just goes on at length about why people who say Bari is being hypocritical because of her stance at Columbia are wrong about what happened 14 years ago, which is boring. But he does eventually type a few words about the current debate. Here’s a…

Maggie Haberman is the best reporter covering the White House. She understands Trump’s bizarre psyche as well as anyone who’s willing to write about him. She’s a reporter first, an analyst second, and an opinion writer never. Her job is literally to “see how this plays out” and tell us how it is playing out.

I don’t agree with everything these guys say by any means but David Frum, Max Boot and Tim Miller.

No; the specific idea - “some leftists stupidly hyperventilate about people with unpopular ideas being ‘fascists’ when it’s not true” - is fair enough. The general ideas - (1) this “dilution of language” is wolf-crying of the sort that will render reasonable people incapable of identifying actual fascists; and (2)…

It would be wonderful to have someone like Anthony Scaramucci debate

“Free speech and debate are dead,” says a person with no reason to fear that there will be any consequence for his or her speech other than that “someone will label” him or her - you know, by freely using words to disagree with him or her. This predicted free exchange of contrasting views through the medium of…

again, I asked nicely that you not do this

congratulations you have written the dumbest thing ever

I said “gets”

you are wrong, no one likes him

I get that he was reporting on things people said but - and I listened to the manner in which he delivered it - it sounds to me like he’s at the very least sympathetic to this so-called “concern.”

Simmons, as usual, comes out of this looking significantly dumber than he thinks he is. The “second version” was not paraphrased. It was a verbatim quote, but abridged, in a manner that did not in any way “[mis]represent the context.” (Neither, really, did the original made-up quote; Zirin’s only real transgression…

This is an acceptable response, right down to evoking the image of sitting in a bar, the actual point of which is to commiserate. Cheers, mate.

Voters do not know enough about politicians to “like” or “dislike” them in the sense that I meant. People who actually know Ted Cruz fucking hate him.

Me saying something is an “indictment of humanity” is not a personal attack on every individual human. I also am reasonably sure you’re not responsible for the holocaust, or the existence of nuclear weapons, or Facebook. You get over it.

hey now, I said please

You want to wonder why his political success even happens?

I’d agree with you, but [two paragraphs agreeing with me].