22% gap is definitely not the controlled apple-to-apple comparison despite your claim. Note the deviously sentenced “mansplain.. after controlling race, ethnicity, education, experience, location”. Objective comparison is not the first thing that comes to mind, when you control the things that doesn’t matter in the…

Okay, I’ll take a bullet...

Stupid feminist bullshit

What a sexist title and article... This blatant misandry is offensive!

You mean continuing to find a new source for confirmation bias on the gender gap is not a lifehack?

Are you saying that someone with years more experience should be paid the same? Because if a person takes 2-3 years out of the workforce for family, and someone doesn’t, then that’s the difference.

Well are you saying we should count maternity leave as working in the field experience that counts to your wage?

Are you not seeing the cyclical reasoning? You say “...you can explain why an issue happens...” but then ask “Why does a gender pay gap still persist?” The answer is already given.

“You can’t mansplain...”

You don’t know what you’re talking about. The studies are about yearly earnings. Not what people literally make per hour. That women wouldn’t be getting paid less per hour because she’s raising a child. She would be getting paid less because she would literally not be working. Do you get it now? The husband would…

This is not a lifehack. This is a blog post pushing the liberal agenda of a leftist think tank.

Just use simple logic to dissect the absurdity of this claim. If women provide equal or superior labor, yet are paid significantly less, then why would you hire a man? These same “economist” at EPI will undoubtedly…

I think you know the answer to this, and are answering someone coming at the issue from a place of intellectual dishonestly in a similar manner because it’s deserved.

Note that there aren’t any composites given, just four examples that could easily be outliers and a vague “almost every.”

Going to respond to Burnttt and Giggloer both with this. This is a topic I think should also be covered since it has been made relevant due to the source material.

I would absolutely argue that as words go, it is equally as bad. It’s a word specifically meant to target a given group of people and shut them out or…

They are quoting Pew Research, not making a personal judgement. Get a grip.

He will likely end up earning less money if he leaves work for a year or two and comes back, yes. But then, what are you talking about now? That work stoppage and long leaves of absence shouldn’t affect your career in any way shape or form?

Which liberal arts degree?

I don’t think that identifying the rebuttal ahead of time actually makes helps you deflect it if you don’t have a counter argument.

“Are you saying the fact that women reproduce and then take care of their children is a reason they should be paid less?”

Your link doesn’t answer my question.