Why does this guy make so many of his sentences turn into jokey questions? That gets really funny after the eighth time in the same video.

It's generally transparently greedy, but the movie that started this trend, Deathly Hallows, I think needed to be split. I don't think it would've worked as well as one movie.

Have you seen Two Broke Girls?

Well, I don't really. I don't eat any animals, period.

Humanity has produced Donald Trump, ISIS, and Two Broke Girls. Can you think of anything as foul as those produced by nature?

Again, I am in no way advocating eating animals because it's all awful and wrong to me, but I can kind of see how some people would make exceptions for fish. On the scaled of fucked up-ness used to measure the industry of murder that produces our meat and fish, there's definitely certain animals that are higher than…

I've been a vegetarian since early 1998, when I was seven. I've never considered eating shrimp, but I have considered the hypothetical situation of eating an animal without a nervous system like a sea sponge. I figure it's safer to just go by taxonomic standards and not eat anything in the entire animalia kingdom.

Octopi aren't fish.

I haven't eaten animals since I was seven, so I think eating fish is pretty fucked up too, but it's not completely arbitrary. The majority of fish species are not as intelligent as commonly eaten mammal and bird species.

I think what's interesting about Matt & Trey is, they are very good at making me laugh even when I don't agree with them. I am not saying Matt & Trey are conservative or libertarian or whatever, but they possess a rare gift in the comedy world. Typically comedians from the right side of the political spectrum are not…

That's not what anyone has said.

It's really a cliche to rail against the use of labels, but I'm going to rail against the use of labels. I don't think "libertarian" is an accurate label for Matt & Trey; I don't really think anything is. They have diverse views that shift over time like any two reasonable humans really.

I would've too. That dog was so sad and cute.

You're right. South Park's job is to make you laugh, and whether that humor comes from the absurd or a nuanced satire is besides the point. I said above that taking the middle ground is easy a lot of the time, but the show's consistently funny, and makes decent, if a little lazy, points about our culture. I don't know…

He was in "Where my Country Gone" briefly.

I think the take away there is that the entirety of Facebook is (and always has been) abysmal, and should likely be ignored.

"Both sides suck" can be lazy, but in all honesty, I don't care a lot of the time because the show is funny, and can often make interesting observations while giving into false equivalencies. No TV show is perfect. South Park has plenty of weaknesses like any other show, and I'm willing to accept those for a very good…

Absolutely, but I think the structure of these past two seasons has made these kind of episodes more powerful. If the show's going to reset at the end, it's harder to feel like anything was accomplished (which isn't necessarily a bad thing, that structure served South Park well for 17 seasons). When I know that…

I am surprised no one has mentioned the mounting similarities between the last two seasons of South Park, and the latter half of Moral Orel. Both started with a townspeople that were just kind of sketches of characters, used for joke delivery. Moral Orel began to expand on individual characters towards the end of its…

RIP Tom Cruise Heidecker