So you’re saying you were not entertained? 

Or Strangest Things, but maybe that paints them in a corner if they want a third series.

My other idea is The Social Ne2rk, because luckily “network” contains “two.”

It’s why it was so scandalous when artists started painting depictions of the everyday lives of people instead of going for the same old depictions of gods and religious figures. I always liked the way Edouard Manet depicted the everyday worker like the one in “A Bar At The Folies-Bergere”. Nothing romanticized, just…

I’ve already seen spin about that and how “He is only registered as a Republican to disrupt the primary and lots of democrats do that”

The shooter was a Republican, and that’s all that’s going to matter to anyone dumb enough to still be undecided. Their ability to message off it is dead.

Art and culture is kind of essential to a society continuing to function, and if the arts are inhabited only by the wealthy you get art that doesn’t understand over half of the society it comes from. 

That’s funny because Emma Roberts is like a 2 on the nepo/talent scale. The AV Club staff will never acknowledge that Dakota Johnson is the 0, but she is.

Touche!

A fine, fine comeback. Bravo!

I bow to your clearly superior rhetorical skills. Your trenchant bon mot has laid me low, so incisive and devastating it was.

That’s stupid. It’s a stupid use of semantics and I hope you know that.

This is honestly my biggest hesitation with this story. I fully am behind believing women when they open up about these stories, and I have absolutely no thoughts about Gaiman. I don’t actually know his work pretty much at all.

Gaiman’s “deeds” sound like private interactions between consenting adults and are none of your business. You imply that none of those young women have agency or are free people with desires and love lives. I know you’re not horny and never been and are in fact a perfect and pure virgin, but lots of people enjoy sex…

While I’ve never been in a position to hire a nanny, I’d probably walk out of a job if I showed up on day one and the boss suggested that I take a bath with him.

There are some interesting quotes missing from the podcast for the second woman who sent the text ‘Thank you for a lovely, lovely night. Wow x.’ the next day and then also “sent Mr Gaiman numerous text and video messages in which she explicitly said she had consented during their sexual encounters, and also said she…

His response where he claimed one of the alleged victims had a “condition that creates false memories” seems really fishy to me.    I think at the very least this is going to come down to a famous man with power used that to sleep with a bunch of women. 

Not a surprise if they contacted him for statements before they published. Having a defence prepared for a blow you know is coming is not proof of guilt or innocence.

I know that we are all supposed to believe that everybody is a sex criminal but I don’t actually think it’s that common. I would be surprised if Neil Gaiman of all people sexually assaulted people...and he sounds surprised.  It sounds like there is more to this story.  As I said above I am totally willing to boycott…

“Overlap in their fanbases” is evidence of wrongdoing? What is wrong with you?

The fact that once you click through to the site, they expect you to sit through a four-goddamn-part podcast to get the full story instead of including all the info in the written story really annoyed me. I’ll wait for more sources to pop up.

Plenty of people in open relationships don’t commit sexual assault.  Not saying Gaiman is innocent but it’s this sorta attitude that gets innocent peoples railroaded as “sexual deviants”.